Teachers’ Strategies for Curriculum Support on Learner Progression Policy: Implications for Inclusive Practices in South African Secondary Schools
Abstract
Learner progression has been widely embraced as an ideal intervention strategy for continuous grade retention. Due to numerous factors behind progression in South Africa, identified learners differ from counterparts in that they require support to bridge the content gap. Opponents of this policy raise concerns about quality education because learners move through the system without meeting standard promotion requirements. However, progression policy stipulates the provision of curriculum support. Therefore, this study explores teachers’ strategies for curriculum support on learner progression toward accessible quality education. The study uses Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as theoretical lens. UDL is an educational framework that advocates accessible learning by addressing the diverse needs of learners through principles that foster inclusivity and adaptability in education. The study is qualitative, placed within an interpretivism paradigm, and adopts a case study design to report part of the findings for a doctoral project. Data was generated through semi-structured interviews with five teachers who formed part of the larger sample. These teachers were sampled for this paper, based on the rich data provided during data collection. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Findings reveal differentiated learning as an ideal strategy to accommodate progressed learners in the teaching and learning process. In addition, teachers’ professional development enhances teachers’ abilities to offer relevant curriculum support based on reasons for progression. These strategies are critical to create equal conducive environment to learn. The study recommends school-based support teams’ (SBST) collaboration towards academic support for progressed learners’ cognitive inclusion.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.3
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aggarwal, D. (2012). History and development of elementary education in India. Sarup and Sons. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2558030
Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusion and equity in education: Making sense of global challenges. Prospects, 49(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09506-w
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Berliner, D. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Education and the Public Interest Center & Policy Research Unit. https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/PB-Berliner-NON-SCHOOL.pdf
Bhagwonparsadh, Y., & Pule, K. G. (2023). Learning support strategies to overcome the effects of promoting condoned Senior Phase Mathematics learners to the FET Phase. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.2
Brahmbhatt, M. (2020). Support provided to progressed learners in the Intermediate and Senior Phases [Master’s dissertation]. University of Pretoria. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/78506
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cerna, L., Mezzanotte, C., Rutigliano, A., Brussino, O., Santiago, P., Borgonovi, F., & Guthrie, C. (2021). Promoting inclusive education for diverse societies: A conceptual framework [Working Papers No. 260]. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/promoting-inclusive-education-for-diverse-societies_94ab68c6-en.html
Chataa, B. M., & Nkengbeza, D. (2019). Challenges faced by primary school teachers in implementing the automatic promotion policy at a school in the Zambezi region. Creative Education, 10(7), 1731-1744.
a. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=94061
Chidi, M. T., Ngobeni, E. T., & Sepeng, P. (2024). Impact of progression on secondary schools learners’ performance in Limpopo province, South Africa. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 8(18), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1519938
Chireshe, R. (2013). The state of inclusive education in Zimbabwe: Bachelor of Education (Special Needs Education) students’ perceptions. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(3), 223–228. http://krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JSS/JSS-34-0-000-13-Web/JSS-34-3-000-13-Abst-PDF/JSS-34-3-223-13-1413-Chireshe-R/JSS-34-3-223-13-1413-Chireshe-R-Tx%5B4%5D.pmd.pdf
Cook, S. C., & Rao, K. (2018). Systematically applying UDL to effective practices for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717749936
Costa, K., Mfolo, L., & Thusi, N. (2024). Navigating post-schooling realities: Challenges and opportunities for progressed learners in South Africa – A multi-method research protocol [preprint]. MetaArXiv, (5rdvf). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5rdvf
Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022). Professional development with universal design for learning: Supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Department of Basic Education (South Africa). (2011). National policy pertaining to the programme and promotion requirements of the National Curriculum Statement Grades R?12. Government Gazette, 722 and 723(36042), September 12. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Policies/PolicyProgPromReqNCS.pdf
Department of Basic Education (DBE), 2012. Approval of the regulations pertaining to the national curriculum statement grades R-12, Government Gazette Vol. 570 No. 36041 of 2012, Government Printers, Pretoria.
a. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Policies/Regulations%20NCS%2005%20Feb%202021.pdf?ver=2021-02-24-105532-657
Department of Basic Education (South Africa). (2015). Republic of South Africa (RSA) guideline for the implementation of promotion and progression requirements for Grades 10–12. Government Gazette.
a. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/c0cc1c10/files/uploaded/Guideline-Promotion-Progression-Jun-2015.pdf
Dube, B., & Ndaba, X. P. (2021). Educating progressed learners in times of COVID-19: How can bricolage help? Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(2), 22–36. https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/547
Engelbrecht, P. (2020). Inclusive education: Developments and challenges in South Africa. Prospects, 49(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09499-6
Equal Education Law Centre. (2022). The promotion and progression of learners in public schools [Know Your Rights pamphlet]. https://eelawcentre.org.za/wp-content/uploads/progression-pamphlet.pdf
Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: Using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.526588
Gama, R. B. (2014). An exploration of life orientation educators’ knowledge and teaching of study skills in Further Education and Training Phase high schools in Ekudibeng Cluster, Gauteng East [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
George, J. L. (2019). The difference between failure and success: Barriers and facilitators impacting on academic performance of progressed learners within the FET Phase of a school in KwaZulu-Natal [Doctoral dissertation]. University of KwaZulu-Natal.
a. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/304374875.pdf
Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices about two inclusive frameworks: Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, Article 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103503
Gronseth, S. L., & Dalton, E. M. (Eds.). (2020). Universal access through inclusive instructional design: International perspectives on UDL. Routledge.
Hennick, C. (2008). 2nd Grade again? “Social promotion” is an unpopular phrase in education, but is retention any better? Instructor, 117(6), 55–56. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ792966
Hoff, N., Peterson, R., & Strawhun, J. (2015). Grade retention & demotion: A traditional discipline consequence [Strategy brief]. Building & Sustaining Student Engagement. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4538.0322
Jacobs, J., & Mantiri, O. (2022). Grade retention and social promotion dichotomy: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.93
Kader, I., (2012). Challenges of grade progression and promotion in Outcomes Based Education among educators of Grade ten learners in the Western Cape: A case study of Emmerose Secondary School [Master’s thesis]. University of the Western Cape, Belville.
Khobe, M.A., (2023). Nature of the progressed grade 12 learners’ self-esteem at high schools in the Motheo education district. International Journal of studies in Psychology, 3(2), 18-23. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ijspsy_v3_n2_a5
Kika, J., & Kotze, J. (2019). Unpacking grade repetition patterns in light of the progression policy in the Further Education and Training Phase. SALDRU: Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit. http://www.opensaldru.uct.ac.za/handle/11090/958
Kolobe, L., & Mihai, M. A. (2021). The integration of technology in supporting progressed learners in English First Additional Language comprehension. Perspectives in Education, 39(2), 303–323. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i2.21
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education. Pearson Education.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Mitchell, D., & Sutherland, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge.
Moagi, D. K. (2020). Exploring Grade six teachers’ views regarding teaching progressed learners in Lichtenburg selected primary schools [Master’s dissertation]. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
Muedi, F., Kutame, A., Ngidi, T., & Uleanya, C. (2021). Strategies of supporting progressed learners for quality teaching and learning in Vhembe district, Limpopo, South Africa. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 138–145. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219937/
Muedi, F. P., Kutame, A. P., Ngidi, T. Z., & Uleanya, C. (2022). Managing assessments for supporting progressed learners in Vhembe district, Limpopo, South Africa. UMT Education Review, 5(1), 28–54. https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/uer/article/view/1906
Munje, P., & Maarman, R. (2017). A capability analysis on the implementation of the school progression policy and its impact on learner performance. Journal of Education, (66), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i66a07
Mwandu, D. K., & Kabeta, R. M. (2024). The effects of 100% Grade seven progression rate policy on learners in secondary schools in Kitwe district, Zambia. Mulungushi University Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 37–50. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/150-Article%20Text-322-2-10-20240731.pdf
Ngema, T. N., & Maphalala, M. C. (2021). The enablers and constraints of learner progression in teaching and learning at South African schools: A teacher’s perspective. Journal of Educational Studies, 20(1), 130–150. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jeds_v20_n1_a9
Nkosi, T. P., & Adebayo, R. O. (2021). An exploration of the progression policy and its effects on learner achievement in KwaZulu-Natal. Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 9(3). https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3698
Okurut, J. M. (2015). Examining the effect of automatic promotion on students’ learning achievements in Uganda’s primary education. World Journal of Education, 5(5), 85?100. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n5p85
Pellegrini, M., & Vivanet, G. (2021). Evidence-based policies in education: Initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120924670
Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2024). Understanding inclusive education: A theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725
Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International journal of educational investigations, 3(8), 51-59.
a. http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/57/IJEI.Vol.3.No.8.05.pdf
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Harvard Education Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED515447
Ryan, J. (2012). Struggling for inclusion: Educational leadership in a neo-liberal world. IAP.
Sabharwal, K. (2018). No detention policy: Rethinking education system of India. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(1), 609–614. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326224502
Sayed, Y., & Moriarty, K. (2020). SDG 4 and the ‘education quality turn’: Prospects, possibilities, and problems. In A. Wulff (Ed.), Grading goal four (pp. 194–213). Brill.
Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677
Smith, S. J., Rao, K., Lowrey, K. A., Gardner, J. E., Moore, E., Coy, K., ... & Wojcik, B. (2019). Recommendations for a national research agenda in UDL: Outcomes from the UDL-IRN preconference on research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(3), 174-185.
a. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207319826219
Sormunen, K. (2020). From inclusive practices to personal strategies. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 16(2), 234. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/314553
Stott, A. E., Dreyer, H., & Venter, P. (2015). Consequences of the progression law in the FET Phase: A case study. Journal of Education, (63), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.17159/i63a04
Suleymanov, F. (2015). Issues of inclusive education: Some aspects to be considered. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 3(4), 1–22. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ejie/vol3/iss4/8/
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
Uludag, K. (2024). Use of virtual academic environments during the coronavirus pandemic. In J. Kumar, M. Arora, & G. E. Bayram (Eds.), Exploring the use of metaverse in business and education (pp. 275–285). IGI Global.
Unesco. (1994). Final report - World confer
Unesco. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Unesco.
Varcoe, L., & Boyle, C. (2014). Pre-service primary teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Educational Psychology, (34), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785061
Westchester Institute for Human Services Research. (1999). The balanced view. Social Promotion and Retention.
Westwood, P. (2018). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061261
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493