Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) – Understanding Online Learners’ Preferences and Experiences

Herman Fassou Haba, Omkar Dastane

Abstract


This paper explores online learners’ preferences and experiences of using Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a leaning environment. The paper thus intends to investigate what online learners prefer and what they experience while using MOOCs. The research employs exploratory approach using qualitative data. It considers reviews posted by the users of the two globally popular website for online learning namely edX (14 million learners) and Coursera (40 million learners). The total of 572 reviews is selected using simple random sampling. Selected reviews were refined based on language and appropriateness and then subjected to thematic analysis pinpointing and recording patterns of meaning (Themes). The thematic analysis presents a framework with eight dimensions to understand MOOC users’ preferences. These identified dimensions are course diversification, experience, pedagogy, support, convenience, ease of use, monetary and quality. The proposed framework can be used to enhance learners experience and continuity of using MOOCs. In future researches, the framework can be tested empirically for its reliability and validity in our future research.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.14


Keywords


MOOCs; Learners’ Preference; Learners’ Experience; Qualitative Study; Online Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Kamin, Y. B., & Saud, M. S. B. (2019). How cyber stalking and cyber bullying affect students’ open learning. IEEE Access, 7, 20199-20210.

Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917703

Andone, D. (2008, July 22-25). Web 2.0 Technologies for Digital Students. IADIS International Conferencee-Learning 2008 (part of MCCSIS 2008), Amsterdam, NL, IADIS, 287–294.

Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e-tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01013.x

Bozkurt, A., Akgün-özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 118-147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080

Bozkurt, A., Ozdamar Keskin, N., & De Waard, I. (2016). Research Trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Theses and Dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami Wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE.

Davis, F. D. (1989a). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–70.

Creelman, A., Ehlers, U., & Ossiannilsson, E. (2014). Perspectives on MOOC quality-An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project. INNOQUAL-International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 78-87.

Haba, H.F. & Dastane, O. (2018). An Empirical Investigation on Taxi Hailing Mobile App Adoption: A Structural Equation Modelling. Business Management & Strategy, 9(1), 48-72. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v9i1.13006

Haba, H. F., Hassan, Z., & Dastane, O. (2017). Factors Leading to Consumer Perceived Value of Smartphones and its Impact on Purchase Intention. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 9(1), 42-71.

Hayes, S. (2015). MOOCs and Quality: A Review of the Recent Literature. QAA MOOCs Network.

Hussin, S. (2012). Taylor Walsh: Unlocking the gates: how and why leading universities are opening up access to their courses. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9425-z

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. In Reading. https://doi.org/ISBN 978-0-9906415-8-2

Li, C., & Zhou, H. (2018). Enhancing the efficiency of massive online learning by integrating intelligent analysis into MOOCs with an Application to Education of Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020468

Mckenna, L. (2012, May 11). The Big Idea That Can Revolutionize Higher Education. The Atlantic. Retrived from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/05/the-big-idea-that-can-revolutionize-higher-education-mooc/256926/

Rice, J. A. (2007). Mathematical statistics and data analysis. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504526

Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A.H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson

Satar, M., Safie, N., Dastane, O., & Ma’arif, M. Y. (2019). Customer Value Proposition for E-Commerce: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2). 454-458. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100259

Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. In Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: the social organization of normality.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 3-10

Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124-143.

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). UNESCO Education Strategy 2014-2021. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - An explorative content analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446

Zhong, S.-H., Zhang, Q.-B., Li, Z.-P., & Liu, Y. (2016). Motivations and Challenges in MOOCs with Eastern Insights. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(12), 954-960. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.824


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493