Shaping Learner Responses in Question-Answer Sequences in the EFL Classroom

Sajjad Pouromid

Abstract


The construct of classroom interactional competence builds upon propositions made by the sociocultural theory of learning to explore the interactional consequences of teacher talk in the foreign language classroom. The sociocultural theory upholds learner participation as the key for learning to take place. Meanwhile, studies with a conversation analytic methodology have shown that learner participation depends in part on teachers’ interactional practices or their classroom interactional competence. That is, teacher talk has the potential to shape learner contributions in the classroom and either facilitate or obstruct their participation. The present study has investigated how teacher talk can do so across question-answer sequences in two EFL classes in Japan and Taiwan in a Collaborative Online International Learning program. The microanalytic study of question-answer sequences in the data indicated that while referential questions, as opposed to display questions, are more likely to generate more elaborate learner responses, the interactional context in which questions are posed can influence their outcome as well. Among the interactional practices identified as facilitators of learners’ participation were asking referential questions at TRPs, asking referential follow-up questions when a communicative breakdown emerges, teacher echoing of learner responses, and paraphrasing the referential question already asked. On the contrary, practices including self-elaboration, self-answering, asking referential questions in or after extended teacher turns, teacher interruptions, and teacher turn completions were found to have obstructive effects on learners’ responses.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.8


Keywords


Classroom interactional competence; referential questions; conversation analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alduais, A. M. S. (2012). An account of teaching strategies which promote student-initiation. Journal of Sociological Research, 3(2), 489-501. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2614

Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47-59. doi:10.2307/3586388

Daşkın, B. C. (2015). Shaping learner contributions in an EFL classroom: Implications for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 6(1), 33-56. doi:10.1080/19463014.2014.911699

David, F. O. (2007). Teachers’ questioning behavior and ESL classroom interaction pattern. Humanity & Social Science Journal, 2(2), 127-131.

Farr, F., Farrell, A., & Riordan, E. (2019). Social interaction in language teacher education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Girgin, U., & Brandt, A. (2019). Creating space for learning through ‘Mm hm’ in an L2 classroom: Implications for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 1–19. doi:10.1080/19463014.2019.1603115

Hall, J. K., & Looney, S. D. (2019). The embodied work of teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Have, P. T. (2012). Doing conversation analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.

Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D. (2013). Two Preferences in Question–Answer Sequences in Language Classroom Context. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 63–88. doi:10.1080/19463014.2013.783497

Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription Notation. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Post-method condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48. doi:10.2307/3587197

Long, M., & Sato. C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger, & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-286). Rowley, MA: Newsbury House.

Markee, N. (2019). Some theoretical reflections on the construct of interactional competence. In M. R. Salaberry, & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: bridging theory and practice (pp. 60-76). New York, NY: Routledge.

McCarthy, M. J. (2005). Fluency and confluence: What fluent speakers do. The Language Teacher, 29(6), 26-28.

McNamara, T. (2019). Language and subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of sociolinguistics, 20, 336-366. doi:10.1111/josl.1_12177

Richards, J. C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667152.002

Salaberry, M. R., & Kunitz, S. (2019). Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: bridging theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell. doi:10.1093/applin/ami048

Schwab, G. (2011). From dialogue to multilogue: A different view on participation in the English foreignâ€language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 3-19. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.562654

Sert, O. (2011). A Micro-analytic investigation of claims of insufficient knowledge in EAL classrooms.Unpublished PhD dissertation, Newcastle University, Newcastle, England.

Sert, O. (2013). Epistemic status check as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45, 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005

Shiozaki, H. (2016, January 21-22). Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) for Critical Reading of Media: Collaboration between IIUM and Kansai University.Paper presented at the International Language and Tourism Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL classroom introduction: A classroom research study. The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 24- 46.

Waer, H. H. E. (2012). Why that language, in that context, right now?: The use of theL1 in L2 classroom interaction in an Egyptian setting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Newcastle University, Newcastle, England.

Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL Classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23. doi:10.1191/1362168802lr095oa

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203015711

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse. Oxon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203827826

Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266. doi:10.1111/ijal.12005

Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493