Technology Interest of Secondary School Students at Five Testing Points over one Complete School Year after Participating at a Student-Centered Learning Program about Bionics

Michaela Marth-Busch, Franz X. Bogner

Abstract


Technology affects our daily lives, although many people do not have any specific knowledge or interest in it. In the learning module fundamentals of technology and biology in different examples of bionics were combined. 324 students took part in a student-centered intervention in a zoo with an affiliated exhibition about bionics. Students were monitored in the interest of technology and its social aspects two weeks before (T0), directly after (T1) and six weeks (T2) after our research-centered learning program with the revised technology questionnaire (Marth & Bogner, 2018). A sub-sample of 191 students have filled questionnaire at two more testing points at twelve weeks (T3) and one year (T4) after participation. Interest reached its peak immediately after the program and dropped again after six weeks and unfortunately fell back to the level before the intervention. The social aspects sub-scale also showed a peak directly after participation as well as a drop six weeks later. In contrast with the interest sub-scale, the social-sub-scale remained constant at the level after six weeks and even after one year was still higher than before the intervention. The previous interest was shown to be dependent on the scores for knowledge acquisition prior to participation.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.7


Keywords


STEM; technology; interest; bionics; long-term study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akpınar, E., Yıldız, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, Ö. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward science and technology: an investigation of gender, grade level, and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2804–2808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.498

Alister, J., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers’ perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 230–239.

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., & David Gijbels. (2013). Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude Towards Technology-survey. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2006), 8–19.

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & van Keulen, H. (2015). Students attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x

Beede, D., Julian, T., & Langdon, D. (2011). Women in STEM : A Gender Gap to Innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1964782

Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484448

Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072

Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (1999). Toward Measuring Adolescent Environmental Perception. European Psychologist, 4(3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.4.3.139

Cannon, R. K., & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships among attitude, motivation, and achievement of ability grouped, seventh-grade, life science students. Science Education, 69(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690203

Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471

Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators. Science Education, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20356

Deci, E L, Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668; discussion 692-700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

Deci, Edward L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., Stewart, C. O., Chappell, S., & Hathcock, S. (2014). The Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary Students. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9387-5

Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0

Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213

Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

FanÄoviÄová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students’ knowledge and attitudes towards plants. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545874

Field, A. (2013). Andy Field - Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (M. Carmichael, Ed.) (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04270_1.x

Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765786

George, R. (2000). Measuring Change in Students’ Attitudes Toward Science Over Time: An Application of Latent Variable Growth Modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009491500456

George, R. (2006). A Cross-domain Analysis of Change in Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Attitudes about the Utility of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500338755

Harding, J., & Rennie, L. J. (1992). What research says to the science and mathematic teachers. Technology Education in Science and Mathematics (Vol. 10). Perth.

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration refrained. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536

Institute ISB. (2004). Curriculum 6th grade. Retrieved from https://www.isb.bayern.de/gymnasium/lehrplan/gymnasium/fachprofil-ebene-2/natur-und-technik-/325/

Institute ISB. (2017). Lehrplan PLUS. Retrieved from https://www.lehrplanplus.bayern.de/seite/lehrplanplus

Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962280

Kärkkäinen, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Sparking Innovation in STEM Education with Technology and Collaboration. A Case Study of the HP Catalyst Initiative. OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k480sj9k442-en

Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002

Langheinrich, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Computer-related self-concept: The impact on cognitive achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.003

Lord, T. R. (2001). 101 Reasons for Using Cooperative Learning in Biology Teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2001)063[0030:RFUCLI]2.0.CO;2

Lovelace, M., & Brickman, P. (2013). Best practices for measuring students’ attitudes toward learning science. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0197

Marth, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2017a). Does the issue of bionics within a student-centered module generate long-term knowledge? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55(September), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.09.001

Marth, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2017b). How a Hands-on BIONICS Lesson May Intervene with Science Motivation and Technology Interest. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(5), 72–89.

Marth, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Monitoring a gender gap in interest and social aspects of technology in different age groups. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9447-2

Mc Robbie, J. C. (2000). Preservice primary teachers' thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(d), 81–101.

McClafferty, T., & Rennie, L. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centres, museums, aquaria and zoos to promoter learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education., 6(4), 175–185.

Nachtigall, W., & Wisser, A. (2013). Bionik in Beispielen: 250 illustrierte Ansätze. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Neurohr, R., & Dragomirescu, C. (2007). Bionics in Engineering-Defining new Goals in Engineering Education at “Politehnica†University of Bucharest. Conference on Engineering Education, 3–6. Retrieved from http://ineer.org/Events/ICEE2007/papers/571.pdf

O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families. PEDIATRICS, 127(4), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Poudel, D. D., Vincent, L. M., Anzalone, C., Huner, J., Wollard, D., Clement, T., … Blakewood, G. (2005). Hands-On Activities and Challenge Tests in Agricultural and Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 10–22.

Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. J. (1986). What do girls and boys think of technology?

Raat, J. H., de Klerk Wolters, F., & de Vries, M. J. (1989). Pupils’ Attitude Towards Technology. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), 4.

Randler, C., Baumgärtner, S., Eisele, H., & Kienzle, W. (2007). Learning at Workstations in the Zoo: A Controlled Evaluation of Cognitive and Affective Outcomes. Visitor Studies, 10(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570701585343

Rennie, L. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1989). Measuring students attitudes and perceptions about technology: A multidimensional concept. In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.), Research in Science Educationsearch (Vol. 19, pp. 221–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Renninger, K. A. (2015). The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045

Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2010). Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9055-7

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sattler, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Short- and long-term outreach at the zoo: cognitive learning about marine ecological and conservational issues. Environmental Education Research, 4622, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1144173

Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Does inquiry-learning support long-term retention of knowledge? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(4), 51–70.

Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A Summary of Major Influences on Attitude Toward and Achievement in Science Among Adolescent Students. Science Education, 74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740102

Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students’ perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356940

Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a Man’S World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042

Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender Differences in Student Attitudes Toward Science - a Metaanalysis of the Literature From 1970 To 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320407

Weinburgh, M. (2000). Gender, Ethnicity and Grade Level as Predictors of Middle School Students ’ Attitudes toward Science. https://doi.org/ED442662

Wigfield, A. (1996). Development between the ages of ll and 25. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 148.

Wolters, F. de K. (1989). A PATT Study Among 10 to 12-Year-Old Students in the Netherlands. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v1i1.a.4

Zeyer, A. (2010). Motivation to Learn Science and Cognitive Style. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 121–128.

Zeyer, A., & Wolf, S. (2010). Is There a Relationship between Brain Type, Sex and Motivation to Learn Science? International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2217–2233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903585184


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493