Revitalizing the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory

Nicolaj Riise Clausen, Claus D. Hansen

Abstract


The Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory (OCLI) is one of the most popular instruments for measuring self-directed learning (SDL). Although several previous studies have validated it, an exploratory application of confirmatory factor analysis had not been attempted; such an analysis provided new insights. Responses from 159 students from Aalborg University, a Problem-Based Learning institution known for its high degree of self-directed project work, were analyzed. This investigation examines all previously suggested factor structures against commonly applied measures and further develops the most promising, identifying a new three-factor structure reaching standard thresholds of model fit. The newly identified underlying dimensions of the OCLI—internal locus of control, the ability to be self-regulating, and avidity for learning—simplify the interpretation of the factors and help mitigate some of the instrument’s previous problems. This will serve to keep the OCLI relevant as an instrument for measuring self-directed learning in the future. We recommend further studies to revise the OCLI, rephrasing and reconceptualizing items that have aged poorly as well as investigating the pattern of the reverse-coded items. Lastly this paper suggests that other statistical instruments might be revitalized through the application of similar methods, taking advantage of the advances in computation and statistical analysis.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.18


Keywords


self-directed learning; validation; scale purification; quantitative analysis; confirmatory factor analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boeren, E. (2018). The Methodological Underdog: A Review of Quantitative Research in the Key Adult Education Journals. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617739347

Boyer, S. L., Edmondson, D. R., Artis, A. B., & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning: A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313494010

Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED359423

Brookfield, S. (1984). Self-Directed Adult Learning: A Critical Paradigm. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848184035002001

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

Clair, R. S. (2011). Writing ourselves into being: A review of the Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education/La Revue Canadianne pour l’Étude de l’Éducation des adultes. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 23(2), 27–44.

Clausen, N. R. (2021). Progression of Self-Directed Learning in PBL: Comparing Consecutive Semesters at AAU. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 24–41.

Daley, B. J., Martin, L. G., & Roessger, K. M. (2018). A Call for Methodological Plurality: Reconsidering Research Approaches in Adult Education. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618760560

Fejes, A., & Nylander, E. (2015). How pluralistic is the research field on adult education? : Dominating bibliometrical trends, 2005-2012. https://doi.org/10.3384/RELA.2000-7426.RELA9063

Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia. https://search-proquest-com.zorac.aub.aau.dk/docview/302856217?pq-origsite=primo

Han, J.-Y., & Lee, M.-Y. (2009). A Study on Validation of OCLI for Evaluating of Life-Long Learning Ability. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 12(4), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2009.12.4.75

Harvey, B. J., Rothman, A. I., & Frecker, R. C. (2006). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory (OCLI). Adult Education Quarterly, 56(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713605286167

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr., J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. http://site.ebrary.com/id/11096679

Leary, H., Walker, A., Lefler, M., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2019). Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning: A literature review. In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning (pp. 181–198). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch8

Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Sage Publications.

Oddi, L. F. (1984). Development of an instrument to measure self-directed continuing learning [Northern Illinois University]. https://search-proquest-com.zorac.aub.aau.dk/docview/303318103/abstract/2CF04F6547564F81PQ/1?accountid=8144

Oddi, L. F. (1986). Development and validation of an instrument to identify self-directed continuing learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848186036002004

Oddi, L. F. (1987). Perspectives On Self-Directed Learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848187038001003

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (Eds.). (2016). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing Self-directed and Self-regulated Learning and Measuring them in the E-learning Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1155

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. NFER-NELSON.

Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(2), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418783530

Six, J. E. (1989). The Generality of the Underlying Dimensions of the ODDI Continuing Learning Inventory. Adult Education Quarterly, 40(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368904000105

Statacorp. (2019). Stata Statistical Software: Release 16 (Release 16) [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC.

Støen Utvær, B. K., & Haugan, G. (2016). The Academic Motivation Scale: Dimensionality, Reliability, and Construct Validity Among Vocational Students. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 6(2), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.166217

Straka, G. A. (1996). Construct validation of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory. In Current developments in Self-Directed Learning. (pp. 65–80). Classic Book Distributors.

Taylor, E. W. (2001). Adult Education Quarterly from 1989 to 1999: A Content Analysis of All Submissions. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(4), 322. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417130122087322

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the Assessment of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education: Evidence on the Concurrent and Construct Validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001018

Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012). Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys: A Review. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 49(5), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0368

Wieland, A., Kock, F., & Josiassen, A. (2018). Scale purification: State-of-the-art review and guidelines. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3346–3362. http://dx.doi.org.zorac.aub.aau.dk/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0740


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493