Implementation of Technical Communication Pedagogy in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
One of the most significant needs in technical communication is to teach students how to communicate complex technical information. This paper systematically reviews the literature to map technical communication (TC) pedagogical strategies and theoretically underpinned approaches. The overall purpose is to illuminate patterns and trends in research that describe TC pedagogy, specifically learning objectives, method of delivery, content, assessment strategies, and theoretical frameworks. Following PRISMA guidelines, the study conducted detailed content analysis on 39 publications from 2017 to 2023 based on specific inclusion criteria.. Results show increasing trends in interdisciplinary, inclusive, and technology-driven approaches and recurrent themes of student-centered objectives, technology-based delivery, and diverse assessments, with Rhetorical Theory being the dominant theoretical framework in TC pedagogy research. Based on the findings, it is recommended that future research and practice in TC pedagogy prioritize the integration of comprehensive theoretical frameworks, such as social constructivism, genre theory, and rhetorical theory, to enhance the effectiveness of teaching strategies and better prepare students for the evolving demands of the modern workforce.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.16
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AlGhamdi, R. (2023). Development of soft skills among computing students in online task-based learning: Insights from technical communication course. International Journal of Technology in Education, 6(2), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.394
Bains, S. (2019). Teaching technical communication to engineering students at scale [Conference session]. 2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, August 19, 2019 (pp. 83–89). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm.2019.00021
Balzotti, J., & Hansen, D. (2019). Playable case studies: A new educational genre for technical writing instruction. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1613562
Batista-Canino, R. M., Santana-Hernández, L., & Medina-Brito, P. (2023). A scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial intention literature: Delving deeper into local citation. Heliyon, 9(2), e13046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13046
Batova, T. (2021). An approach for incorporating community-engaged learning in intensive online classes: Sustainability and lean user experience. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1860257
Bay, J. (2022). Fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion in the technical and professional communication service course. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(1), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3137708
Chong, F., & Roundtree, A. K. (2021). Student recruitment in technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1774660
Clark, D. (2018). Teaching content strategy in professional and technical communication. In T. Bridgeford (Ed.), Teaching professional and technical communication: A practicum in a book, 58-71. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607326809.c004
Cleary, Y. (2021). Fostering communities of inquiry and connectivism in online technical communication programs and courses. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620977138
Dayley, C. (2023). Increasing inclusion in technical communication academic programs. Technical Communication, 70(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc963195
Dessie, W. M., Bewuket, H. K., & Tariku, M. E. (2022). Technical communication for civil engineering: Academia–industry interdisciplinary needs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 774–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2081532
Dharmani, P., Das, S., & Prashar, S. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of creative industries: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.037
Ding, H. (2019). Development of technical communication in China: Program building and field convergence. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1551576
Dong, L., & Gao, Z. (2023). Who are China’s technical communicators? A survey on the state of diversity, equity, and inclusion of the profession. Technical Communication, 70(3), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc583549
Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001
Gao, Z., Gao, Y., & Yu, J. (2020). What makes it findable? An exploration on user search behavior and the findability of technical documentation [Conference session]. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, July 19–22, 2020, Kennesaw, GA, USA (pp. 154–160). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00031
Green, G., & Shorer, T. (2022). Beliefs, emotions, and usage of information and communication technologies in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Health sciences students’ perspectives. Digital Health, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221131188
Howell Smith, M. C., & Shanahan Bazis, P. (2021). Conducting mixed methods research systematic methodological reviews: A review of practice and recommendations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 546–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820967626
Jamaludin, K. A., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Ibrahim, M. M. (2020). Technical communication pedagogical model (TCPM) for Malaysian vocational colleges. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00597-6
Jamaludin, K. A., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Razzaq, A. R. A. (2019). Framework for technical communication skills content development for students in Malaysian vocational colleges: A fuzzy delphi study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.04.005
Jiang, L., Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2022). Developing a genre-based model for assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Integrating theory with practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, Article 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100869
Jones, N. N. (2020). Coalitional learning in the contact zones: Inclusion and narrative inquiry in technical communication and composition studies. College English, 82(5), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce202030756
Kim, D., & Olson, W. M. (2020). Using a transfer-focused writing pedagogy to improve undergraduates’ lab report writing in gateway engineering laboratory courses. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2961009
Lam, C., & Biggerstaff, E. (2019). Finding stories in the threads: Can technical communication students leverage user-generated content to gain subject-matter familiarity? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(4), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2946995
Lam, C., & Wolfe, J. (2023). An introduction to quasi-experimental research for technical and professional communication instructors. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519221143111
Luna, A., & Izu, C. (2023). Using IF-AT cards to engage students in deeper learning of course content. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 18(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2023.3251182
Luo, M., DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2024). The effectiveness of a technical communication module for automobile manufacturing students at vocational colleges. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519231217998
Luo, M. D., Alias, N., & DeWitt, D. (2022). Investigating the needs of technical communication for TVET students: A case study of manufacturing students in the central part of China. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.01.011
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology?enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12154
Melonçon, L., Rosselot-Merritt, J., & St.Amant, K. (2019). A field-wide metasynthesis of pedagogical research in technical and professional communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 50(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281619853258
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International journal of surgery, 8(5), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative thematic inquiry: A new method for analyzing qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
Patterson, L. (2020). Engineering students’ empathy development through service learning: Qualitative results in a technical communication course [Conference session]. 2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, July 19–22, 2020, Kennesaw, GA, USA (pp. 68–75). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00017
Perez, E., Manca, S., Fernández-Pascual, R., & Mc Guckin, C. (2023). A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11921–11950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11647-2
Pfluger, A., Armstrong, M., Corrigan, T., Nagelli, E., James, C., Miller, A., & Biaglow, A. (2020). Framework for analyzing placement of and identifying opportunities for improving technical communication in a chemical engineering curriculum. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.02.001
Poudel, M., & Roy, D. (2019). 3D printing and technical communication in a creative factory classroom: A case study in Japan [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (pp. 92–99). https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323802
Pourmand, P., Pudasaini, B., & Shahandashti, M. (2021). Assessing the benefits of flipped classroom in enhancing construction students’ technical communication skills. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 147(1), Article 0000025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000025
Rea, A. (2022). Coding equity: Social justice and computer programming literacy education. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2022.3143965
Roy, D., & Ziegler, W. (2019). Logistics and challenges of an intercultural technical communication collaborative project between two Japanese and German universities [Conference session]. 2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, July 23–26, 2019, Aachen, Germany (pp. 18–24). https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm.2019.00009
Sharma, D. (2022). Teaching professional use of social media through a service-learning business communication project. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221074687
Sloan, J., Becker, K. L., & Frank, T. (2022). Integrating technical communication block in a computer applications course: Lessons learned [Conference session]. 129th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Excellence through Diversity, ASEE 2022, June 26–29, 2022, Minneapolis Convention Center, Minneapolis, United States. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85138272438&partnerID=40&md5=dd3e1a7f680eeba8a9f7dea2ec8081a2
Sonka, K., McArdle, C., & Potts, L. (2021). Finding a teaching ally: Designing an accessibility-centered pedagogy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3091190
Tham, J. (2023). Instructional design pedagogy in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2130991
Tham, J., Howard, T., & Verhulsdonck, G. (2022). Extending design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence into technical communication and user experience design programs: Further pedagogical implications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 52(4), 428–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211072533
Trauth, E. (2021). “From homeless to human again”: A teaching case on an undergraduate “tiny houses and technical writing” course model. Technical Communication, 68(4), 88–101. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85138761262&partnerID=40&md5=4ea67b90ff5c21c7feac58f5f5c09be8
Wan, X. (2022). Development of technical communication in China: Program building and industrial trends [Conference session]. 2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, July 17–20, 2022, Limerick, Ireland (pp. 128–132). https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00027
Watson, R. B. (2018). Enriching technical communication education: Collaborating across disciplines and cultures to develop the piClinic console. SIGDOC ’18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, (20), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233756.3233929
Webb, G., Eisenstein, A., Patterson, L., & Eikenaar, J. (2021). Introducing engineering students to communication practices for engagement with indigenous communities [Conference session]. 2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, October, 21–23, 2021, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (pp. 39–43). https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm52174.2021.00012
Wright, D. (2024). Perspectives on usability testing with IoT devices in technical communication courses. Technical Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2194345
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493