Educative Curriculum Material and Its Impact on the Teachers’ Instructional Performance and Learners’ Achievement
Abstract
This research aim is to reveal the components of Educative Curriculum Material (ECM) and its impacts on the chemistry teachers’ instructional performance and learners’ achievement. This study applied the experimental method with matching only pretest-posttest control group design. A total of 36 junior chemistry teachers as the experiment group, and 36 senior chemistry teachers as the control group, and were selected by purposive-sampling. The sample of learners is chosen randomly. They consisted of 64 people as an experimental group and 64 people as a control group from different High School. The research instruments were a questionnaire, form of the analysis lesson plan and observation instructional performance, the items of teacher knowledge and learners' achievement. Data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively through t-tests and Normalization-Gain. The research findings indicate that (1) ECM components that effectively enhance knowledge of chemistry teachers are curriculum, chemistry content, instructional strategies, professional development, and academic skills. (2) Understanding pedagogical and professional knowledge of junior chemistry teachers as ECM users and trained better than senior chemistry teachers who do not use ECM. (3) The instructional performance of junior chemistry teachers who use ECM is better than senior chemistry teachers both in their planning and implementation. (4) The learner’s achievement that learns from teacher used ECM increased higher significantly than those who did not. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the ECM effectively improves on chemistry teachers’ instructional performance and learners’ achievement. Therefore it is recommended that Chemistry Teacher Group Discussion use the ECM.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.1.12
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arias, A. M., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., Marino, J. C., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Justifying Predictions: Connecting Use of Educative Curriculum Materials to Learners’ Engagement in Science Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, (28)1, 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X. 2016.1277597
Anthopoulou, K., Valkanos, E., Fragkoulis, I. (2017). The Professional Development of Adult Educators: The Case of the Lifelong Learning Centres (L.L.C) in the Prefecture of Evros, Greece. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (16)11, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.16.11.5
Arifin, M., Hernawan, A. S., Andriyani, D., Susilana, R., Chandrawati, T., Sanjaya, W. (2007). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka. http://repository.ut.ac.id/id/eprint/4618
Barron, E. R., Rupley, W. H., Paige, D., Nichols, W. D., Nichols, J., Jr Lumbreras, R. (2018). Middle School Teachers’ Knowledge and Use of Comprehension Strategies in Discipline Instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (17)10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.10.1
Bernard, M. E. (2017). Impact of Teaching Attitudes and Behaviors for Learning on the Reading Achievement of Students Falling Behind. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (16)8, 51-64.
Bobrakov, S. (2014). Student Teachers’ Perceptions of Theory and Practice Integration through Action Research. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (8)1, 1-15.
Clark, D. (2000). ADDIE Model. Retrieved from: http://www.nwlink.com/ ~donclark/hrd/ history/ history.html
Dasuki, A. (2009). Reformasi Guru dan Tantangannya. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/manajerial/article/download/1264/881
Davis, E. A., & Krajick, J. S. (2005). Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
De Vos. W., Bulte, A., & Pilot, A. (2003). Chemistry Curricula for General Education: Analysis and Elements of a Design. In Gilbert, J.K., et al. (Eds.), Chemical Education: Toward Research-based Practice, 17, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_5
Depdiknas. (2005a). Pembinaan Profesionalisme Tenaga Pengajar (Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2005b). Undang-Undang No. 14 tahun 2005 tentang Undang-Undang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Retrieved from: http://luk.staff. ugm. ac.id/ atur/UU14-2005GuruDosen.pdf
Depdiknas. (2007). Permendiknas No. 16 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Retrieved from: http://vervalsp.data.kemdikbud.go.id/prosespembelajaran/file/Permendiknas%20No%2016%20Tahun%202007.pdf
Dharma, S. (2008a). Strategi Pembelajaran dan Pemilihannya. Jakarta: Ditjen PMPTK. Retrieved from: https://teguhsasmitosdp1.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/14-kode-03-b5-strategi-pembelajaran-dan-pemilihannya.pdf
Dharma, S. (2008b). Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Ditjen PMPTK. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/4889700/penilaian_kinerja_guru_direktorat_tenaga_kependidikan_direktorat_jenderal_peningkatan_mutu_pendidik_dan_tenaga_kependidikan_departemen_pendidikan_nasional_2008_kompetensi_evaluasi_pendidikan_04_b3
Ditjen, D. (2006). Pedoman Memilih dan Menyusun Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: DitjenDikdasmen. Retrieved from: https://issuu.com/downloadbse/docs/pedoman_memilih_dan_meyusun_bahan_ajar
Edge, C. (2015). On the Nature of Experience in the Education of Prospective Teachers: A Philosophical Problem. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (13)1, 29-41.
Espinosa, A. A., Junio, M. M. V., Manla, M. C., Palma, V. M. S., Lucenari, J. L. S., & Punzalan, A. E. (2014). Analysis of Achievement Tests in Secondary Chemistry and Biology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (4)1, 75-82.
Flores, F., Garcia, A., Alvarado, C., Mora, M. D. C. S., Sosa, P., & Reachy, B. (2004). Analysis of Instructional Materials in the Natural Sciences: Implications on National Training Courses. Mexico: Chemistry Department, UNAM.
Gilbert, J. K., Jong, O. D., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., Driel, J. H. V. (2003). Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/ 5488505/ Chemical_education_towards_research_based_practice_science_technology
Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum Materials: Scaffolds for New Teacher Learning? A Research Report. Washington: University of Washington: Center for Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved from: https://www.education.uw.edu/ctp/sites/default/files/ctpmail/PDFs/SecCurr-CTPG-0...
Hamdu, G., Sopandi, W., & Nahadi, N. (2018). Debriefing Program for Prospective Elementary School Teachers in Developing Learning Aids. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 17(6), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.6.7
Holbrook, J. (2005). Making Chemistry Teaching Relevant. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1-12. Retrieved from: https://www.sensepublishers.com/media/2421-relevant-chemistry-education.pdf
Ibrahim, M. Y., Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Othman, Z. (2019). Communication Skills: Top Priority of Teaching Competency. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (18)8, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.2
Julie, C. (2008). Primary Teachers’ Interactive Whiteboard Practice Across One Year: Changes in Pedagogy and Influencing Factors. EdD Thesis. London: King’s College University of London.
Jusuf, R., Sopandi, W., Wulan, A. R., & Sa’ud, U. S. (2019). Strengthening Teacher Competency through ICARE Approach to Improve Literacy Assessment of Science Creative Writing. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 18(7), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.7.5
Karyadi, B., Prawiradilaga, D. S., Maudiati, S., Setiawan, Y., Wardani, I. G. A. K., Delfy, R., Sardjiyo, Pannen, P., Winataputra, U. S., & Andayani. (2007). Pembaharuan dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). The Benefits and Limitations of Educative Curriculum Materials, Journal of Science Teacher Education, (28)1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1279470
Ma’ruf. (2009). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Suara Guru. Wordpress.com.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). “The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: a possible “hidden variable†in diagnostic pretest scoresâ€. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259-1268.https://doi.org/ 10.1119/1.1514215
Mustofa, (2007). Upaya Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 4(1),76-88.
Reiser, B. J., Krajcik, J., Moje, E., & Marx, R. (2003). Design Strategies for Developing Science Instructional Materials. Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Philadelphia: PA. Retrieved from: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~krajcik/IQWSTSite/Papers/reiser_krajcik_NARST03.pdf
Rosbiono, M. (2010a). Pengembangan Material Kurikulum Edukatif untuk Meningkatkan Performa Guru dan Siswa. Disertasi. Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Rosbiono, M. (2010b). Needs Analysis of Chemistry Teachers to Develop Curriculum Material with the “ATK†Model and “ADIR†Educative Framework. Proceeding for the 4th International Seminar of Science EducationCurriculum Development of Science Education in the 21st Century. Science Education Program, School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education. P19-1-10. Retrieved from: http://lib.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2010-sutopo-prosiding-seminar-internasional-pendidik an-ipa-ke-4-upi-ok.pdf
Scheneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2000). The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials in Reforming Science Education. Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Michigan University. National Science Foundation as part of the Center for Learning Technologies in Education Grant. doi:10.1.1.379.8640&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Scheneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42(3), 283-312. Retrieved from: http://www.project2061.org /research/ccms/site.archive/documents/Enacting_Reform_Based_Science_Materials.pdf
Sudarman. (2007). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Tenaga Pengajar Sebagai Kontribusi Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 3(1), 16-24. Retrieved from: http://physicsmaster.orgfree.com/ Artikel%20&%20Jurnal/ Wawasan%20Pendidikan/PBL%20Model.pdf
Sukmadinata, N. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya. Retrieved from: http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/ buku/detail/ metode-penelitian-pendidikan-nana-syaodih-sukmadinata-33324.html
Talin, R. (2016). Why Historical Thinking Skills was not there?. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (15)3, 134-142.
Vaudroz, C., Berger, J-L., & Girardet, C. (2015). The Role of Teaching Experience and Prior Education in Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and General Pedagogical Knowledge at the Onset of Teacher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (13)2, 168-178.
Wiryawan, S. A. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka. Retrieved from: http://repository. ut.ac.id/view/ divisions/ bmp=5Ffkip/2008 .html
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493