The Role of Metacognition (Metacomprehension) and Inferential Ability on Reading Comprehension Ability
Abstract
In this study, the researchers explored the role of the metacognition component on reading comprehension ability and the role of reading comprehension ability in predicting the level of accuracy of metacomprehension. The first stage of research used experimental research to see the effect of inferential ability and metacognition on the reading comprehension ability. The second stage of research using the correlational method is used to study the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This study involved 300 primary school students from 10 schools with a composition of 200 students involved in the first phase of research and 100 students involved in the second phase of research. Samples were taken randomly. The results show that the individual's reading comprehension ability can predict the level of metacomprehension accuracy. Metacognitive strategies that are carried out through planning, monitoring and evaluation have a significant impact on students' reading comprehension skills. Inferential-based questions have a significant impact on the accuracy of metacomprehension. In addition, the metacognitive component (metacomprehension), and inferential ability can improve students' reading comprehension skills, especially increasing inferential understanding. The implication of this research is that teachers can consider these aspects as well as optimise the role of these variables to enhance students' reading comprehension skills.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.15
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, K. D., & Hancock, T. E. (2008). Reading comprehension improvement with individualized cognitive profiles and metacognition. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070801938320
Anderson, M., & Thiede, K. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
Banks, K. (2012). Are Inferential Reading Items More Susceptible to Cultural Bias Than Literal Reading Items? Applied Measurement in Education, 25(3), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2012.687610
Bohlmann, N. L., & Downer, J. T. (2016). Self-Regulation and Task Engagement as Predictors of Emergent Language and Literacy Skills. Early Education and Development, 27(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1046784
Bracken, S. S., & Fischel, J. E. (2008). Family reading behavior and early literacy skills in preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838835
Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The Effects of an Integrated Reading Comprehension Strategy: A Culturally Responsive Teaching Approach for Fifth-Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2012.664581
Cabell, S. Q., Gerde, H. K., Hwang, H. J., Bowles, R., Skibbe, L., Piasta, S. B., & Justice, L. M. (2021). Rate of Growth of Preschool-Age Children’s Oral Language and Decoding Skills Predicts Beginning Writing Ability. Early Education and Development, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.1952390
Cantrell, S. C., & Carter, J. C. (2009). Relationships among learner characteristics and adolescents’ perceptions about reading strategy use. In Reading Psychology (Vol. 30, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802275397
Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Wu, J. H. (2016). Forecasting reading anxiety for promoting English-language reading performance based on reading annotation behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.917107
Connor, C. M. D., Phillips, B. M., Kim, Y. G., Lonigan, C. J., Kaschak, M. P., Crowe, E., Dombek, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2018). Examining the Efficacy of Targeted Component Interventions on Language and Literacy for Third and Fourth Graders Who are at Risk of Comprehension Difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1481409
Curenton, S. M., & Justice, L. M. (2008). Children’s preliteracy skills: Influence of mothers’ education and beliefs about shared-reading interactions. Early Education and Development, 19(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280801963939
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/ 0003-066X.34.10.906
Fletcher, J. M. (2009). Scientific Studies of Reading Measuring Reading Comprehension Measuring Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, January 2012, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003
Ghaemi, H., & Ghaemi, H. (2011). Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Assessing the Relationship Between Stuttering Students’ Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies and Their Reading Comprehension Performance. Language Testing in Asia, 1(2), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-2-7
Gier, V., Kreiner, D., & Natz-Gonzalez, A. (2009). Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy. Journal of General Psychology, 136(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.136.3.287-302
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021). Does reading comprehension competence determine level of solving mathematical word problems competence? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012049
Hadianto, D., S. Damaianti, V., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Literacy Teaching Design Integrating Local Culture Discourse and Activities to Enhance Reading Skills. Cogent Education, 9(1), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2016040
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021a). Enhancing scientific argumentation skill through partnership comprehensive literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012015
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021b). The role of multimodal text to develop literacy and change social behaviour foreign learner. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1446a
Hayashi, Y., Seta, K., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Development of a support system for measurement and analysis of thinking processes based on a metacognitive interpretation framework: a case study of dissolution of belief conflict thinking processes. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0091-y
Johansson, S. (2013). The relationship between students’ self-assessed reading skills and other measures of achievement. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-1-3
Kane, S., Lear, M., & Dube, C. M. (2014). Reflections on the role of metacognition in student reading and learning at higher education level. Africa Education Review, 11(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2014.935001
LaRusso, M., Kim, H. Y., Selman, R., Uccelli, P., Dawson, T., Jones, S., Donovan, S., & Snow, C. (2016). Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035
Lim, H. (2020). Exploring the validity evidence of a high-stake, second language reading test: an eye-tracking study. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00107-0
Loh, C. E., Sun, B., & Majid, S. (2020). Do girls read differently from boys? Adolescents and their gendered reading habits and preferences. English in Education, 54(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1610328
Majumdar, R., Bakilapadavu, G., Majumder, R., Chen, M. R. A., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2021). Learning analytics of humanities course: reader profiles in critical reading activity. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00164-w
Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
Mckee, S. (2012). Reading Comprehension, What We Know: A Review of Research 1995 to 2011. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-1-45
Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
Mulyati, Y., & Hadianto, D. (2022). Relation between Behavioural Problems and Reading Skills in Gender Contexts : Forecasting Longitudinal Data from Kindergarten to Fifth Grade. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 120–130. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0101
Ness, M. (2011). Explicit reading comprehension instruction in elementary classrooms: Teacher use of reading comprehension strategies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2010.531076
O’Shea, L. J., & O’Shea, D. J. (1994). A component analysis of metacognition in reading comprehension: The contributions of awareness and self-regulation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 41(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655940410103
Ozturk, N. (2017). An analysis of teachers’ self-reported competencies for teaching metacognition. Educational Studies, 43(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1273761
Pacello, J. (2014). Integrating Metacognition into a Developmental Reading and Writing Course to Promote Skill Transfer: An Examination of Student Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2014.906240
Ptacek, B. (2016). Early Literacy and the Public Library: An Opportunity of a Lifetime (of Reading). Public Library Quarterly, 35(4), 338–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2016.1245007
Samiei, F., & Ebadi, S. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ inferential reading comprehension skills through a flipped classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00157-9
Solheim, O. J., & Lundetræ, K. (2018). Can test construction account for varying gender differences in international reading achievement tests of children, adolescents and young adults?–A study based on Nordic results in PIRLS, PISA and PIAAC. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1239612
Susantini, E., Puspitawati, R. P., Raharjo, & Suaidah, H. L. (2021). E-book of metacognitive learning strategies: design and implementation to activate student’s self-regulation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00161-z
Tarchi, C. (2017). Comprehending Expository Texts: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors. Reading Psychology, 38(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1245229
Wulfemeyer, J. (2019). Modeling Metacognition and Providing Background Knowledge via Guided Reading Videos. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1514284
Young, C., Durham, P., Miller, M., Rasinski, T. V., & Lane, F. (2019). Improving reading comprehension with readers theater. Journal of Educational Research, 112(5), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1649240
Yousuf, M. S., Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S. K., Ziadeh, B. S., Kilani, M., & Al-Kamil, E. (2021). The effects of pediatric primary prevention programs on screen-time and reading habits of children in Jordan. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-021-00092-8
Zhou, J., He, J., & Lafontaine, D. (2020). Cross-cultural comparability and validity of metacognitive knowledge in reading in PISA 2009: a comparison of two scoring methods. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1828820
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493