Same Mindset, Different Pedagogical Strategies: A Case Study Comparing Chinese and Finnish Teachers

Junfeng Zhang, Elina Kuusisto, Kirsi Tirri

Abstract


Given that little is known about the correlations between teachers’ mindset and their pedagogical strategies, in this article, we explore Chinese and Finnish teachers’ mindsets and their pedagogical strategies from the perspective of praise and adaptive teaching. This study was conducted in two Chinese schools (N = 50) and one Finnish school (N = 77) with instruments of the mindset inventory, praise scale and adaptive learning scale (PALS). The results reveal that Chinese and Finnish teachers’ preferences for pedagogical strategies differ even though they hold the same growth mindset, which confirms that teachers do not necessarily utilize growth mindset messages even though they endorse a growth mindset. While Finnish teachers prefer pedagogical methods in accordance with growth mindset pedagogy, Chinese teachers seem to apply mixed strategies reflecting both growth and fixed mindsets. The results imply differences within Finnish and Chinese teacher education regarding the internalization of the principles of growth mindset pedagogy. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.15


Keywords


Mindset; pedagogical strategy; praise; adaptive teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Chen, W. W., & Wong, Y. L. (2015). Chinese mindset: theories of intelligence, goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong students. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 714-725. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.893559

Chen, Z. C. (2014). SPSS ä¸Žç»Ÿè®¡åˆ†æž [SPSS and statistic analysis]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. London: Hachette UK.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Dweck, C. S., Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2014). Academic tenacity: Mindsets and skills that promote long-term learning. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.

Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1â€to 3â€yearâ€olds predicts children's motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526-1541. doi:10.1111/cdev.12064

Guo, S. (2005). Exploring current issues in teacher education in China. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), 69-84.

Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of pearson's and spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87-93. doi:10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1

Jonsson, A. C., & Beach, D. (2012). Predicting the use of praise among pre-service teachers: The influence of implicit theories of intelligence, social comparison and stereotype acceptance. Education Inquiry, 3(2), 259-281. doi:10.3402/edui.v3i2.22033

Kansanen, P. (2003). Teacher education in Finland: Current models and new developments. In B. Moon, L. Vlăsceanu, & L. C. Barrows (Eds.), Institutional approaches to teacher education within higher education in Europe: Current models and new developments (pp. 85-108). Bucharest: European Centre for Higher Education.

Kuusisto, E., Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2017). How do school children and adolescents perceive the nature of talent development? A case study from Finland. Education Research International 2017, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2017/4162957

Leondari, A., & Gialamas, V. (2002). Implicit theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: Impact on students’ achievement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 279-291. doi:10.1002/pits.10035

Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 529-545. doi:10.1007/bf03173470

Li, J. (2012). The Chinese model of teacher education: Retrospects and prospects over a century. Frontiers of Education in China, 7(3), 417-442. doi:10.3868/s110-001-012-0022-2

Li, J. (2013). China's quest for world-class teachers: A rational model of national initiatives and institutional transformations. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 316-330. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.809053

Makel, M. C., Snyder, K. E., Thomas, C., Malone, P. S., & Putallaz, M. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 203–212. doi:10.1177/0016986215599057

Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Ministry of Education. (2002). 教育部关于“å五â€æœŸé—´æ•™å¸ˆæ•™è‚²æ”¹é©ä¸Žå‘展的æ„è§ [The opinion on the reform and development of teacher education during the tenth five-year national plan period]. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7058/200203/t20020301_162696.html

Ministry of Education. (2013). 教育部关于å°å‘《中å°å­¦æ•™å¸ˆèµ„æ ¼è€ƒè¯•æš‚è¡ŒåŠžæ³•ã€‹ã€Šä¸­å°å­¦æ•™å¸ˆèµ„æ ¼å®šæœŸæ³¨å†Œæš‚è¡ŒåŠžæ³•ã€‹çš„é€šçŸ¥ [Interim measures for the qualification examination of primary and secondary school teachers, interim measures for the regular registration of primary and secondary school teachers' qualifications]. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201308/t20130821_156643.html

Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2011). Teacher education in Finland. In M. ValenÄiÄ Zuljan, & J. Vogrinc (Eds.), European dimensions of teacher education: Similarities and differences (pp. 33-51). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.

Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300-313. doi:10.1037/edu0000064

Patterson, M. M., Kravchenko, N., Chen-Bouck, L., & Kelley, J. A. (2016). General and domain-specific beliefs about intelligence, ability, and effort among preservice and practicing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 180-190. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.004

Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok—Not everyone can be good at mathâ€: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731-737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Hanhimäki, E., & Tirri, K. (2018). Teachers’ implicit meaning systems and their implications for pedagogical thinking and practice: A case study from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 487-500. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M., & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher's classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204-213. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002

Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313-336. doi:10.1080/15298860290106805

Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. (2015). Exploring teacher effects for mindset intervention outcomes in seventh-grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10, 17-32.

State Council of People’s Republic of China. (2010). 国家中长期教育改é©å’Œè§„划纲è¦ï¼ˆ2010-2020）[Outline of China’s national plan for medium and long-term education reform and development (2010-2020)]. Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/china_national_long_term_educational_reform_development_2010-2020.pdf

Tirri, K. (2014). The last 40 years in Finnish teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 600-609. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.956545

Wen, H. J. (Ed.). (1989). Brief introduction to teacher training. Beijing: Beijing Teachers' University Press.

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., ... & Paunesku, D. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

Zhang, J., Kuusisto E., & Tirri, K. (2017). How teachers’ and students’ mindsets in learning have been studied: Research findings on mindset and academic achievement. Psychology, 8(9), 1363–77. doi:10.4236/psych.2017.89089

Zhang, J., Kuusisto E., & Tirri, K. (2019). How do students’ mindsets in learning reflect their cultural values and predict academic achievement? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(5), 111-126. doi:10.26803/ijlter.18.5.8


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493