Effects of Computer Simulations, Attitudes Towards Chemistry and Prior Knowledge on Students’ Academic Achievement in Chemistry

Samuel Jere, Mamotena Mpeta

Abstract


Improving academic achievement and students’ attitudes towards chemistry are among the important goals of science education. This study aimed to determine the influence of computer simulations on students’ attitudes and examine the predictive effects of the attitudes, students’ prior conceptual knowledge and computer simulations on their academic achievement after being taught chemical kinetics. The mixed-method study was based on the constructivist learning theory with a quasi-experimental design to collect quantitative data and semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data. An experimental group of 53 grade 12 students was taught using simulations, and a control group of 65 students was taught using the conventional approach at two secondary schools in Limpopo Province, South Africa. A questionnaire and an achievement test were used to collect the data, which were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28. An independent samples t-test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the students’ attitudes after instruction (t = 5.682, p < .05, d = 0.48) in favour of the experimental group. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that attitude, students’ prior conceptual knowledge and computer simulation instruction were significant predictors of academic achievement (prior knowledge: ? = 0.49, t = 6.712, p < .05, attitude: ? = 0.18, t = 2.248, p < 0.05, and instructional method: ? = 0.40, t = 4.886, p < .05). Students with more positive attitudes, higher prior knowledge and who learnt using computer simulations had greater academic achievement. These findings have implications for practising teachers, as using computer simulations in teaching chemistry can result in improved academic achievement and attitudes towards chemistry.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.3


Keywords


academic achievement; attitudes; chemical kinetics; chemistry; computer simulations; prior knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G. K., Lemarinier, P., & O’Hare, G. M. (2017). Agent based modelling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software. Computer Science Review, 24, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001

Aguilera, D., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2020). What effects do didactic interventions have on students’ attitude towards science? A meta-analysis. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 573–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9702-2

Ajzen, I. (2012). Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211423363

Al-Ali, O. A., & Gaber, S. A. (2023). Improving teachers’ attitudes toward the teaching of intellectually disabled students through training in evidence-based practices. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.18

Alanazi, A. (2016). A critical review of constructivist theory and the emergence of constructionism. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21694/2378-7031.16018

Bellová, R., Balážová, M., & Tom?ík, P. (2023). Are attitudes towards science and technology related to critical areas in science education? Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(3), 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1991298

Binder, T., Sandmann, A., Sures, B., Friege, G., Theyssen, H., & Schmiemann, P. (2019). Assessing prior knowledge types as predictors of academic achievement in the introductory phase of biology and physics study programmes using logistic regression. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0189-9

Bormanaki, H. B., & Khoshhal, Y. (2017). The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and its implication for receptive skills: A theoretical study. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 8(5), 996–1005. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.22

Bouchacourt, F., & Buschman, T. J. (2019). A flexible model of working memory. Neuron, 103(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.020

Çelik, B. (2022). The effects of computer simulations on students’ science process skills: Literature review. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i1.17

Chan, J. Y., & Bauer, C. F. (2015). Effect of peer?led team learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attitude, and self?concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi-experimental designs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21197

Cheung, D. (2009a). Developing a scale to measure students’ attitude toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2185–2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802189799

Cheung, D. (2009b). Students’ attitude toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 39, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4

Cheung, D. (2011). Evaluating student attitude toward chemistry lessons to enhance teaching in the secondary school. Educación Química, 22(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0187-893x(18)30123-x

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Flaherty, A. (2020). A review of affective chemistry education research and its implications for future research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00200f

Fraser, K. L., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2015). Cognitive load theory for the design of medical simulations. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(5), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000097

Golder, J. (2018). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170753

Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650308

Heng, C. K., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). The interaction effects of gender and grade level on secondary school students’ attitude towards learning chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1446a

Herga, N. R., ?agran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a

Jacoby, J., Morrin, M., Jaccard, J., Gurhan, Z., Kuss, A., & Maheswaran, D. (2002). Mapping attitude formation as a function of information input: Online processing models of attitude formation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276602753338243

Jere, S., & Mpeta, M. (2024). Enhancing learners’ conceptual understanding of reaction kinetics using computer simulations: A case study approach. Research in Science Education, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10182-5

Johnstone, A., Sleet, R., & Vianna, J. (1994). An information processing model of learning: Its application to an undergraduate laboratory course in chemistry. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382163

Kahveci, A. (2015). Assessing high school students’ attitude toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00186a

Kareem, J., Thomas, R. S., & Nandini, V. (2022). A conceptual model of teaching efficacy and beliefs, teaching outcome expectancy, student technology use, student engagement, and 21st-century learning attitudes: A STEM education study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12025

Kearney, M. (2004). Classroom use of multimedia-supported predict–observe–explain tasks in a social constructivist learning environment. Research in Science Education, 34, 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8795-y

Koçak, Ö., Göksu, ?., & Göktas, Y. (2021). The factors affecting academic achievement: A systematic review of meta-analyses. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(1), 454–484. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286675.pdf

Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2018). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, & B. T. Johnson (Ed.), The handbook of attitudes, Volume 1: Basic principles (pp. 45–105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178103

Lee, J. (2016). Attitude toward school does not predict academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.009

Maio, G. R., Verplanken, B., & Haddock, G. (2018). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214299

Mao, P., Cai, Z., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X. (2021). The relationship between attitude toward science and academic achievement in science: A three-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784068

Mikeska, J. N., Shattuck, T., Holtzman, S., McCaffrey, D. F., Duchesneau, N., Qi, Y., & Stickler, L. (2017). Understanding science teaching effectiveness: Examining how science-specific and generic instructional practices relate to student achievement in secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2594–2623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1390796

Mwita, K. (2022). Factors to consider when choosing data collection methods. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1842

Nabizadeh, S., Hajian, S., Sheikhan, Z., & Rafiei, F. (2019). Prediction of academic achievement based on learning strategies and outcome expectations among medical students. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1527-9

Nja, C. O., Orim, R. E., Neji, H. A., Ukwetang, J. O., Uwe, U. E., & Ideba, M. A. (2022). Students’ attitude and academic achievement in a flipped classroom. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08792

Ozel, M., Caglak, S., & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.006

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De-Jong, T., Van-Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., Verkuilen, J., Ng, F., Wang, Y., & Barrientos, J. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21008

Samuel, N. N., & Okonkwo, I. G. (2021). Relationship between metacognition, locus of control, and academic achievement in secondary school chemistry students in Anambra State, Nigeria. Education Research International, 2021, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6698808

Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitude and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003

Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2007). A meta?analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20212

Seery, M. K. (2009). The role of prior knowledge and student aptitude in undergraduate performance in chemistry: A correlation–prediction study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914502h

Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Factors affecting secondary school students’ academic achievements in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(12), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.7

Sugano, S. G. C., & Nabua, E. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on the effects of teaching methods on academic performance in chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13259a

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=ucj1ygAACAAJ

Taber, K. S. (2015). The role of conceptual integration in understanding and learning chemistry. In J. García-Martínez, & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 375–394). Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch15

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Vilia, P. N., Candeias, A. A., Neto, A. S., Franco, M. D. G. S., & Melo, M. (2017). Academic achievement in physics–chemistry: The predictive effect of attitude and reasoning abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01064

Vilia, P., & Candeias, A. A. (2020). Attitude towards the discipline of physics–chemistry and school achievement: revisiting factor structure to assess gender differences in Portuguese high-school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1706012

Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). The dynamics of the schoolchild’s mental development in relation to teaching and learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(2), 198?211. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.10.2.198

Wang, L. H., Chen, B., Hwang, G. J., Guan, J. Q., & Wang, Y. Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0

Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A. G., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2019). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.7275/55hn-wk47

Xu, X., Villafane, S. M., & Lewis, J. E. (2013). College students’ attitude toward chemistry, conceptual knowledge and achievement: Structural equation model analysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp20170h

Younis, B. K. (2017). The effects of scientific inquiry simulations on students’ higher order thinking skills of chemical reaction and attitude towards chemistry. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 1158–1161. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-11-7

Zudonu, O. C., & Njoku, Z. C. (2018). Effect of laboratory instructional methods on students’ attitude in some chemistry concepts at senior secondary school level. Global Scientific Journals, 6, 46–61. https://www.academia.edu/37120534/EFFECT_OF_LABORATORY_INSTRUCTIONAL_METHODS_ON_STUDENTS_ATTITUDES_IN_SOME_CHEMISTRY_CONCEPTS_AT_SENIOR_SECONDARY_SCHOOL_LEVEL


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493