Exploring Challenges Influencing the Discontinued Utilisation of the Flipped Classroom Pedagogy: A Case of South Africa Underprivileged High School and Organic Chemistry

Josphine Munyaradzi Chakawodza, Emmanuel Mushayikwa, Magdeline Stephen

Abstract


The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated technological advancements in education. However, when the threat of COVID-19 subsided some schools discontinued the use of technology-enhanced flipped classroom. This study reports on challenges that could have influenced the discontinued utilisation of technology-mediated flipped classroom model that supported some of the underprivileged high schools of South Africa during the COVID-19 era. While acknowledging that the final decision on whether to discontinue rests with the teachers, learner challenges are equally important as they can contribute to the teachers’ decisions. Hence, this study, anchored by the TPACK framework and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory, explored both learner and teacher challenges that influence discontinuation of the use of the flipped learning model. This entailed using semi-structured interviews of purposively selected teachers and learners (N=8) to close this gap in the literature on the use of flipped classroom in the post-COVID-19 era focusing on organic chemistry. Using deductive thematic analysis, the key challenges that could have contributed to the discontinuation of the use of this teaching model were identified as lack of access to Internet services, stable Wi-Fi and ability to navigate the online learning system, competence, motivation, effect of lack of support from the educational institutions and teacher overloading. These findings contribute to the literature on the continued use of this teaching model beyond emergencies such as COVID-19 by highlighting challenges that educational practitioners should be wary of. Additionally, the study has implications for the need to fast-track infrastructure and teacher professional development in underprivileged high schools.

 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.14


Keywords


challenges influencing discontinuation; flipped classroom model, organic chemistry; underprivileged high school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

Apotheker, J., & Veenstra, I. (2015). Twenty-first century skills: Using the Web in chemistry education. In J. García-Martínez, & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 565–594). Wiley-VHC Verlag.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In V. Braun, & V. Clarke (Eds.), APA handbook of research (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.

Chakawodza, J. M., Nakedi, M. M., & Kizito, R. N. (2024a). Effectiveness of blended teaching on academic achievement in organic chemistry: A case of Grade-12 learners from an underprivileged South African school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 248–274. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.13

Chakawodza, J. M., Nakedi, E. M., & Kizito, R. N. (2024b). Effectiveness of flipped classroom pedagogy in promoting learning engagement in grade-12 students in the context of South Africa and COVID-19. International Journal of Science Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2342574

Damoah, B., & Omodan, B. I. (2022). Post-COVID-19 pandemic era teaching and learning strategies in South African schools. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(11), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2022sp3118

Department of Basic Education, South Africa. (2022). NSC Examinations 2021: Diagnostic report – Part 1 (Content subjects). https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2021NSCReports/2021%

Department of Basic Education, South Africa. (2023). NSC Examinations 2022: Diagnostic report – Part 1. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2022NSCReports/2022%20Diagnostic%20Report%20Part%201%20Content%20Subjects.pdf?ver=2022-02

Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49–64. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/183899/

Fisher, J., Bushko, K., & White, J. (2017). Blended beyond borders: A scan of blended learning obstacles and opportunities in Brazil, Malaysia, & South Africa. wise. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED586369.pdf

Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1449787418801702

Flynn, A. B. (2015). Structure and evaluation of flipped chemistry courses: Organic & spectroscopy, large and small, first to third year, English and French. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00224e

Fuchs, K. (2021). Innovative teaching: A qualitative review of flipped classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.2

Garrison, D., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

He, W., Holton, A., Gu, H., & Farkas, G. (2019). Differentiated impact of flipped instruction: When would flipped instruction work or falter? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(1), 32–49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206961.pdf

Kapur, M., Hattie, J., Grossman, I., & Sinha, T. (2022). Fail, flip, fix, and feed – Rethinking flipped learning: A review of meta-analyses and a subsequent meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.956416

Krahenbuhl. (2017). An engaging, yet failed flip. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 12, 132–144. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152089.pdf

Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 5983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983

Maphalala, M. C., & Mpofu, N. (2023). Experiences of South African academics moving from contact to emergency remote teaching: Lessons for the future. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 40(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122023/8084

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mmakola, S., & Maphalala, M. (2023). Blended teaching and learning in South African secondary schools in the post-Covid-19 pandemic era. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(40), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122023/8081

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

Olmefors, O., & Scheffel, J. (2023). High school students’ perspectives on flipped classroom learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(4), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1948444

Pearse, N. (2019). An illustration of deductive analysis in qualitative research [Conference session]. Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies (Vol. 2019-June, pp. 264–270). Academic Conferences Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/RM.19.006

Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938

Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2015). Flipping the chemistry classroom with peer instruction. In J. García-Martínez, & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 319–343). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch13

Seery, M., & O’Connor, C. (2015). E-learning and blended learning in chemistry education. In J. García-Martínez, & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 651–669). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch26

Tekane, R., Pilcher, L. A., & Potgieter, M. (2020). Blended learning in a second year organic chemistry class: Students’ perceptions and preferences of the learning support. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00099B

Tomas, L., Evans, N. S., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4

van Dyk, H., & White, C. (2019). Theory and practice of the quintile ranking of schools in South Africa: A financial management perspective. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), Article 1820. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns1a1820


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493