Mapping Research Trends on EFL Student Engagement: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2015 to 2024

Jiang Haixia, Nor Hafizah Adnan, Fariza Binti Khalid

Abstract


This article presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications focusing on student engagement within the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. The study uses data retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database on December 3, 2024, employing Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis and VOSviewer for advanced data visualisation. A total of 986 relevant articles were meticulously evaluated, identified through keyword searches for “student* engagement,” “learner* engagement,” and “EFL.” The findings reveal a consistent upward trend in the annual number of publications from 2015 to 2024, reflecting a growing academic interest in this domain. Geographically, China emerges as the leading contributor, producing the highest volume of publications. The study also identifies the most prolific journals, prominent academic institutions, key citation metrics and highly referenced works in the field. Network visualisation maps generated through VOSviewer provide insights into author keywords, co-authorship patterns by nation and author, citation networks by country and document, the co-occurrence of all keywords, and co-citation analysis of cited sources. The prominence of research on EFL student engagement in highly cited journals over the past decade underscores its significance among educators and scholars. The study helps refine theoretical frameworks for EFL student engagement by identifying gaps in existing models and proposing integrative approaches that combine cognitive, emotional and behavioural dimensions and emphasise the role of language learning in promoting global citizenship.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.24


Keywords


student engagement; EFL; bibliometric analysis; WoS; education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on

web accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 250–258. http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0819-21689

Alexander, K. L., ? Horsey, E. C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673158

Anderman, E. M., ? Patrick, H. (2012). Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability /intelligence, and classroom climate. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly ? C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 173-191). Springer Science. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Barth, M., Haustein, S., & Scheidt, B. (2014). The life sciences in German–Chinese cooperation: An institutional-level co-publication analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 99–117.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1147-9

Carvalho, M., Fleury, A. C., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology road mapping (TRM): Contributions and trend. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1418–1437. https://doi:10.1016/j. techfore.2012.11.008

Chen, C. (2003). Mapping scientific frontiers. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781447151272

Cruz-Cárdenas, J., Parra-Domínguez, J., Zabelina, E., Deyneka, O., & Ramos-Galarza, C. (2023). Blended learning and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies (pp. 456–465). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_33

Derakhshan, A., Dewaele, J. M., & Noughabi, M. A. (2022). Modeling the contribution of resilience, well-being, and L2 grit to foreign language teaching enjoyment among Iranian English language teachers. System, 109, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102890

Derakhshan, A., Fathi, J., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2024). Classroom social climate, growth language mindset, and student engagement: The mediating role of boredom in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 3415-3433. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407

Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538

Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027

Ding, J., Ahlgren, P., Yang, L., & Yue, T. (2016). Document type profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and country level. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(3),

–41. https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201618

Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/136216800125096

Fathi, J., Greenier, V., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Self-efficacy, reflection, and burnout among Iranian EFL Teachers: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2, 13–37. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.121043

Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013002005

Frandsen, T., & Rousseau, R. (2004). Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods.

Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20100

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469

H?n?z, G., & Çelik, Ö. (2024). A bibliometric and content analysis of student engagement research in English language teaching. Language Awareness, 34(1), 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2024.2367970

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A., & Mercer, S. (2021). Engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613

Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Vasalsampi, K., Silinskas, G., Aunola, K., Poikkeus, A. M., Nurmi, J. E. (2014). Task-focused behavior mediates the associations between supportive interpersonal environments and students’ academic performance. Psychological Science 25(4), 1018–1024. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797613519111

Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 2, 278–308. https://doi.org/110.1002/tesq.171

Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010). Citation analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2010.505518

Meier, M. M. (2011). Knowledge management in strategic alliances: A review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00287.x

Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 643–660). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–58542– 0_40–1

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/9781108445924

Michels, C., & Fu, J-Y. (2014). Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference

proceedings in web of science. Scientometrics, 100(2), 307–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1309-4

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2010). National medium- and long-term education reform and development plan (2010–2020). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html

Miwa, S., & Jitosho, R. (2020). The effect of attitude on engagement and performance among Japanese university students: Focusing on utilizing knowledge of English. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4), 1448–1457. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.4.21.1448

Nurmala, I., Irianto, S., Franchisca, S., Amsa, H., & Susanti, R. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning: A meta-analysis study on English language teaching tools. Journal on Education, 6(1), 2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3221

Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation, 26(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.009

Phipps, J. P. (2022). Examining the sources and development of EFL learner self-efficacy through narrative inquiry. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(4), 1181–1199. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.4.3.1181

Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation, 26(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.009

Raman, A., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2019). Blended learning in higher education 4.0. A brief

review. In A. Raman & M Ratharishnan (Eds.), Redesigning higher education

initiatives for industry 4.0 (pp. 70–84). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7832-1.ch005

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7

Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101060

Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307–326. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13673270910931125/full/html

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

Skupin, A. (2004). The world of geography: Visualizing a knowledge domain with

cartographic means. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl 1),

–5278. https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/101/suppl_1/5274.full.pdf.

Sulis, G. (2022). Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro perspectives. System, 110, 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902

Tabacaru, S. (2019). Web of Science versus Scopus: Journal coverage overlap analysis. Texas A&M University Libraries. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=DBquFZYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=DBquFZYAAAAJ:eQOLeE2rZwMC

Tusino, D. P., & Saputro, W. T. (2022). The effects of synchronous and asynchronous language learning on learner engagement in EFL writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(2), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.2.18.655

Wu, W-C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C.., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners' oral proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 2, 142-157. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305789355

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. Manual for VOSviewer

version 1.6.15. VOSviewer Manual.

https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.15.pdf

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology – I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., van Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708

Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status, and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721

Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent

consequences? Scientometrics, 62(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005- 0007-7

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2021). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10648-021-09628-3

Xu, Q., Sun, D., & Zhan, Y. (2023). Embedding teacher scaffolding in a mobile technology supported collaborative learning environment in English reading class: Students' learning outcomes, engagement, and attitudes. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 17(1–2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2023.128340

Xu, X., Alsop, S., & Tsui, H. (2024). Macro-level engagement in computer engineering MOOC lectures: Comparing a high-rated and a low-rated course. Language and Education, 38(5), 838–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2314131

Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018).SE with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001

Zhou, S. A., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2023). Dynamic engagement: A longitudinal dual-process, reciprocal-effects model of teacher motivational practice and L2 student engagement. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231158789

Zuccala, A., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1979–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21588


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493