Elementary School Teacher Development Policy in Yogyakarta City
Abstract
This research analyses policy on elementary school teacher development as implemented in Yogyakarta City. The research was conducted using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Respondents of research were forty stakeholders in elementary school teacher development policy including teachers, principals, officers from local government, and member of the local house of representative. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and focused group discussion (FGD). The results suggest that a policy on developing elementary school teachers has been implemented. However, such policy is viewed as highly related to local politics as consequences of local autonomy. Some teachers and member of local house of representative view policy on teachers as part of local government effort to strengthen political position. To some extends, the policy has positive impact in the form of teacher continuing education. However, the policy has negative effect such as uneven or even discriminative distribution especially among private schools.Â
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.6.14
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbot, A. (2017). Nature of the Indonesia-United States education relationship, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(4), 545-560. doi:0.1080/14767724.2016.1195724.
Afandi, A. K. (2012). Konsep kekuasaan Michel Faucault [Concept of power according to Michel Faucault], Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 131-149. Retrieved from http://teosofi.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/teosofi/article/view/82.
Baedhowi. (2004). Implementasi kebijakan otonomi daerah bidang pendidikan: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Kendal dan Surakarta [Implementation of autonomy policy in education: Case study in Kendal and Surakarta]. Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.
Creswell. J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Second edition). London: Sage Publications.
Dodi, L. (2017). Sentiment ideology: Membaca pemikiran Lewis A. Coser dalam teori fungsional tentang konflik [Ideology sentiment: Reading Lewis A. Coser thought in functional theory about conflict], Jurnal Al-‘Adl, 10(1), 104-124.
Hadisusanto, D., Sidharto, S., & Siswoyo, D. (1995). Pengantar ilmu pendidikan [Introduction to educational sciences]. Yogayakarta: FIP IKIP Yogyakarta.
Hendratno, E.T. (2009). Negara kesatuan, desentralisasi, dan federalisme [Nation-state, decentralization, and federalism]. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Irine, S. (2009). Desentralisasi pendidikan dan dinamika sosial [Educational decentralization and social dynamics]. Yogyakarta, Universitas Gajah Mada, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Mayo, P. (2008). Antonio Gramsci and his relevance for the education of adults, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 418-435. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00357.x
Mudhoffir, A.M. (2013). Teori kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi sosiologi politik [Theory of power by Michel Foucault: Challenges for political sociology], Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 18(1), 75-100. doi:10.7454/mjs.v18i1.3734.
Nielsen, H. D. (1998). Reforms to teacher education in Indonesia: Does more mean better?, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 18(2), 9-25. doi:10.1080/0218879980180203
Prihatini, C. E. (2011). Penggunaan simpul-simpul komunikasi sosial sebagai strategi kampanye [The use of social communication channels as campaign strategy], Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 81-102. doi:10.24002/jik.v8i1.183.
Rafiqie, M. (2008). Implementasi kebijakan pendidikan di era otonomi daerah (Studi multi situs pada tiga kabupaten di Kawasan Tapal Kuda) [Implementation of educational policy in local autonomy era (A multi sites study in three regencies in Tapal Kuda Area)]. Malang, Universitas Negeri Malang, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Ritzer, G. (1996). The McDonaldization thesis: Is expansion inevitable?, International Sociology, 11(3), 291-308. doi:10.1177/026858096011003002.
Rohman, A. (2013a). Guru dalam pusaran kekuasaan [Teachers in the midst of political power]. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Rohman, A. (2013b). Kekuasaan guru dalam birokrasi pemerintahan daerah [Teachers power in local government bureacracy], Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 18(2), 121-130. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/3167
Rohman, A., Muhadjir, N., & Suyata. (2013). Dinamika relasi politik antara otonomi guru dan dominasi kekuasaan [The dynamics of political relation between teachers autonomy and power domination], Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(2), 101-113. doi:10.21831/jppfa.v2i2.2622.
Silalahi, U. (1989). Studi tentang ilmu administrasi [Study on administrative sciences]. Bandung: CV. Sinar Jaya.
Siswoyo, D. (1996) Ilmu pendidikan dalam tantangan [Educational sciences within challenges], Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 1-13.
Siswoyo, D. et al. (2011) Ilmu pendidikan [Educational sciences]. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Spring, J. (1993) Conflict of interests: The politics of American education. New York: Longman.
Supriyanto. (2010). Dinamika politik pengambilan kebijakan pembentukan dua dinas pendidikan di Kabupaten Bantul [The dynamics of decision-making in creation of two educational offices in Bantul]. Yogyakarta, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Undergraduate Thesis.
Suwignyo, A. (2017). The American influence in Indonesian teacher training, 1956–1964, History of Eduction, 46(5), 653-673. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2017.1328614.
Wagman, J. (2003). Power brokers play role in campaign for school reform. Saint Louis Post-Dispatch.
Williams, G.A. (1960). The concept of 'egemonia' in the thought of Antonio Gramsci: some notes on interpretation, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21(4), 586-599. doi:10.2307/2708106.
Wisudawati, D. N. R. (2014). Isu pendidikan dalam kampanye politik [Educational issues in political campaign], Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 579-587. doi:10.24832%2Fjpnk.v20i4.167.
Wong, K.K. (2006). The political dynamics of mayoral engagement in public education, Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 164-177. doi:10.17763/haer.76.2.g07306666x605852.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493