Learning EFL Online During a Pandemic: Insights into The Quality of Emergency Online Education

Hussein Assalahi

Abstract


This study investigates English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' perceptions of the causal relationships among teaching, social, and cognitive presences, indicative of a community of inquiry in online EFL course. Their relationships to demographic variables are also explored. There has been a growing interest in using the community of inquiry framework to explore the existence of teaching, social, and cognitive presences as indicative of the quality of online educational experience. The causal relationships among the three presences and whether demographic variables such as gender and program of study predict these presences have not received considerable attention. To examine the relationships among the three presences, the Community of Inquiry (COI) survey instrument was administered to 737 learners of EFL. Factor analysis was performed, and the findings confirmed the factor structure of the COI. In addition, structural equation modelling and Chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) analyses confirmed the hypothesized causal relationships among the three presences. Results revealed that teaching presence was the core factor in sustaining an online community of inquiry and gender significantly predicted perceptions of teaching presence. Implications for research on online language teaching, policy, and practice are discussed.  

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.12


Keywords


EFL; community of inquiry framework; teaching presence; social presence; cognitive presence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adamus, T., Kerres, M., Getto, B., & Engelhardt, N. (2009, March 5-9). Gender and e-tutoring: A concept for gender sensitive e-tutor training programs. Paper presented at the 5th European symposium on gender and ICT digital cultures: Participation–Empowerment–Diversity, 2009, University of Bremen, Germany (pp. 5-7). Retrieved from http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/soteg/gict2009/proceedings/GICT2009_Adamus.pdf

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive, and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.66

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005

Al lHassan, S., & Shukri, N. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning in Enhancing Female Students' Satisfaction in the Saudi Context. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 190-203.

Al Lily, A. (2011). Online and under veil: Technology-facilitated communication and female experience within academia. Technology in Society, 33(1-2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.005

Alaulamie, L. A. (2014). Teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence as predictors of students' satisfaction in an online program at a Saudi University (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, Ohio, USA). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=ohiou1395341753&disposition=attachment

Alavi, S., & Taghizadeh, M. (2013). Cognitive presence in a virtual learning community: An EFL Case. International Journal of E-learning & Distance Education, 27(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/818

Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The internet and higher education, 11(3-4), 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Archibald, D. (2010). Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1–2), 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001

Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., Vaezi, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education., 70, 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001.

Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4

Blake, C. (2009). Potential of textâ€based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00858.x

Block, D. (2003). The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Georgetown University Press, NW, Washington, DC.

Bollen, K. & Noble, M. (2011). Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. In D. Pfaff (Ed.), Quantification of Behavior. Conference Proceedings of the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences (15639–15646). The Rockefeller University, New York. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010661108.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London, England: sage.

Fotos, S., & Browne, C. (Eds.). (2013). New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610775

Fowler, F. (2009). Survey Research Methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230184

Garrison, D. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and higher education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263

Garrison, D., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American journal of distance education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Garrison, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The internet and higher education, 13(1-2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

Goda, Y., & Yamada, M. (2013). Application of CoI to design CSCL for EFL online asynchronous discussion. In Z. Akyol & D. Garrison (Eds.), Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice (pp. 295-316). PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch014

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall

Henry, A. (2019). Online media creation and L2 motivation: A socially situated perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 372-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.485

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modelling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation Modelling (3rd ed.). NY: Guilford Press.

Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014a). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. (2014b). New exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis insights into the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.002

Lambert, J. L., & Fisher, J. L. (2013). Community of inquiry framework: Establishing community in an online course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2019.1642976

Lamy, M., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lantolf, J. P. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context, (pp. 349-370). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840975.018

Lee, S. M. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002

Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2012). A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000395

Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2005). An extension of the CHAID tree-based segmentation algorithm to multiple dependent variables. In C. Weihs & W. Gaul (Eds.). Classification - The Ubiquitous Challenge. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., (240-247). University of Dortmund, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28084-7_18

Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of Women in Online Degree-Completion Programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.455

Olesova, L., Richardson, J., Weasenforth, D., & Meloni, C. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: A mixed methods study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 30-42.

Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.7275/qf69-7k43.

Pederson, R. (2012). Situated learning: Rethinking a ubiquitous theory. Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(2), 123-148.

Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2017). Students' perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071

Richardson, J. T., & Long, G. L. (2003). Academic engagement and perceptions of quality in distance education. Open Learning, 18(3), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051032000131008

Rovai, A., & Baker, J. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 31−44.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017

Sturgis, P., Roberts, C., & Smith, P. (2014). Middle Alternatives Revisited: How the neither/nor Response Acts as a Way of Saying "I Don't Know"? Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452527

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Wang, W., & Zhan, J. (2020). The Relationship Between English Language Learner Characteristics and Online Self-Regulation: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073009


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493