Life Sciences Teachers’ Views on Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues in Genetics using an Inquiry Approach

Portia Ngwenya, Lydia Mavuru

Abstract


The study sought to establish teachers’ views about scientific inquiry in teaching genetics whilst addressing socio-scientific issues (SSIs). The argument was if teachers do not fully understand the holistic nature of scientific inquiry, it prevents them from using SSIs effectively to facilitate learners’ understanding of abstract concepts. The study focused on genetics as a topic with SSIs and with abstract concepts difficult to present in concrete materials. Therefore, the paper aimed to learn about Life Sciences teachers’ view in using scientific inquiry in teaching genetics whilst addressing socio-scientific issues. In an explanatory sequential mixed method research design, two questionnaires were administered to 100 Life Sciences teachers, to seek their views about scientific inquiry and understanding of socio-scientific issues respectively. Interviews were administered only to six teachers whose responses based on the analysis of data from questionnaires, were considered as informed, partially informed and naïve views. Lesson plans for selected teachers were analysed. The findings showed that the teachers were aware and appreciative of the inquiry-based approaches and socio-scientific issues embedded in genetics. The teachers however required extensive knowledge and skills on the procedures of inquiry that have to be employed when addressing socio-scientific in genetics. These findings inform teachers and teacher professional development programmes on the importance of context as the source of socio-scientific issues that tend to impact on learner understanding of concepts in topics such as genetics.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.8


Keywords


genetics; scientific inquiry; Life Sciences; socio-scientific issues; teachers’ views

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbulut, H. I., & Demir, O. (2020). Science teachers’ views of socio scientific issues. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 237-256. https://doi.org.10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.17

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org.10.1080/07294360.2014.934336

Amos, R., Christodoulou, A., Grace, M., & Levinson, R. (2017). Teaching science using socio-scientific inquiry based learning: UK pre-service teachers perspectives. Southampton, UK: University College London.

Amos, R., & Levison, R. (2018). Socio-scientific inquiry based learning (Ssibl): Gearing social action to scientific knowledge. New Perspectives in Science Education, Conference Proceedings, 590-594.

Ariza, M. R., Abril, A. M., Quesada, A., & García, F. J. (2014). Bridging inquiry based learning and science education on socio scientific issues. Contributions to the PARRISE project. In L. G. Chova, A. López Martínez & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 2599-2607). Valencia, Spain: IATED Academy.

Balim, A. G., & Ozcan, E. (2014). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards socio-scientific issues. International Conference, New Perspectives in Science Education, Conference Proceedings: Dokuz Eylul University Scientific Research Project.

Batten, J., & White, C. C. (2014). Exploring genetics across the middle school science and math curricula. Raleigh, NC: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, NC State University.

Bryan, L. A., & Keys, C. W. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry based science with teachers essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 38(6), 631-645. https://doi.org.10.1002/tea.1023

Bosser, U. (2018). Exploring the complexities of integrating socio-scientific issues in teaching. Kalmar, Sweden: Linnaeus University Press.

Crawford, B. A. (2014). From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Vol. II pp. 529-556. New York: Routledge.

Chu, H. N. R. (2008). Shyness and EFL learning in Taiwan: A students’ use of strategies, foreign language anxiety, motivation, and willigness to communicate [PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, United States].

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1996). Theory of the moral of Life. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston Inc.

Schein, E. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture, and organisational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90052-3

Ekborg, E., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2012) Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43, 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9279-5

Foulk, J. A., Friedrichsen, P. J., & Sadler, T. D. (2020). Science in socio-scientific issues: Teaching with a timeline activity. The Science Teacher, 35-39.

Galano, S., Zappia, A., Smaldone, L., & Testa, I. (2016). Secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. Naples, Italy: Department of Physics, University Federico II.

Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science & Education, 28, 639-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-91-091-00065-x

Harlen, W. (2014). Helping children’s development of inquiry skills. Inquiry in primary science education (IPSE), 1, 5-19.

Hewson, M. G. (2015). Embracing indigenous knowledge in science and medical teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9300-1_11

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Juntunen, M., & Aksela, M. (2013). Life-cycle analysis and inquiry-based learning in chemistry teaching. Science Education International, 24(2), 150-166.

Kawasaki, J., & Sandoval, W. A. (2020). Examining teachers’ classroom strategies to understand their goals for student learning around science practices in the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 384-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2019.1709726

Kibuka-Sebitosi, E. (2007). Understanding genetics and inheritance in rural schools. Educational Research, 41(2), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.20079656063

Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8399-8

Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011

Setty, S., & Kosinki-Collins, M. S. (2015). A model inquiry-based genetics experiment for introductory biology students: Screening for enhancers and suppressors of Ptpmeg. American Biology Teacher, 77(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.1.6

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical Research: Planning and Design (10th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools – Recommendations and summary of research findings. London: The Wellcome Trust (Online). http://www.wellcomeac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_-document/wtd003446.pdf

Longden, B. (2010). Genetics- are there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of Biological Education, 16(2), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439

Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2009). Student cellular and molecular explanation of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718

Millar, R., & Hunt, A. (2002). Science for public understanding: A different way to teach and learn science. The School Science Review 83(304), 35-42.

Monk, M., & Dillon, J. (2000). The nature of science knowledge. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 72-78). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Msila, V. (2009). School choice and intra- township migration: Black parents scrambling for quality education in South Africa. Journal of Education, 46, 81-98.

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733

National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Successful K-12 stem education: Identifying effective approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: NAP.

Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., & Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian pre-service science teachers’ views on socio-scientific issues based science learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

Nyamupangedengu, E. (2015). Teaching genetics to pre-service teachers: A teacher educator’s approach to transformative practice through self-study. Doctoral thesis submitted at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Available at http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/19606

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Teaching practices for enactment of socio-scientific issues instruction: An instrumental case study of an experienced biology teacher. Research in Science Education, 51, 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9799-3DO

Parr, J. C. (2013). Views of socioscientific issues among educators: The willingness of teachers to accept SSIs into the classroom and the reason underlying those beliefs. Dissertation submitted to University of Southern Mississippi: The Aquila Digital Community. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/530

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Penn, M., Ramnarain, U., & Wu, H-K. (2019). The Relationship between Grade 12 learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry and achievement in Physical Sciences. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Southern African Association of Research in Mathematics and Science Technology Education (SAARMSTE) Conference. University of Kwa-Zulu Natal: Durban, South Africa 15-17 January 2019.

Pope, T. (2017). Socioscientific Issues: A framework for teaching ethics through controversial issues in science. Teach Journal of Christian Education, 11(2), 42-49.

Pukkilla, P. J. (2004). Introducing student inquiry in large introductory classes. Genetics. 166(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.11

Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review Public Health, 35, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440

Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003) Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio?scientific issues. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.

Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 162-185. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4612

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023

Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.

Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2011). A pedagogical model of ethical inquiry in socio-scientific issues in science. Research Science Education, 43, 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z

Schalk, K. A. (2012). A socioscientific curriculum facilitating the development of distal and proximal NOS conceptualizations. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (1), 1-24.

Sousa, C. (2017). Integrating bioethics in sciences’ curricula using values in science and socioscientific issues. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 4(1), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2017.6481

Smith, M. K., & Wood, W. B. (2016). Teaching genetics: Past, present, and future. Genetics Society of America, 204, 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.187138

Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research community of knowledge claim. American Journal of Educational Research 4(47), 570-577. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-7-10

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.

Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147-158. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/227

Tsai, C. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socioscientific issues on students' scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers and Education, 116, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009

Vasconcelos, C., Cardoso, A., & Vasconcelos, M. L. (2018). Socio-scientific issues and scientific literacy. 11th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, November 12th-14th, Seville, Spain.

Veugelers, P. J. (2001). Proximate and contextual socioeconomic determinants of mobility: Multilevel approaches in a setting with universal health care coverage. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(8), 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.8.725

Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socio-scientific issues and discourse in science education. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Zeidler, D. L. & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173684


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493