Delving into Personalisation Behaviours in a Language MOOC
Abstract
Given the large amounts of learning data they generate and their flexible nature, Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs) allow for the emergence of various forms of personalisation. This study examines how 137 language learners personalised their learning in a Language MOOC on English presentation skills. It also investigates learner-reported reasons that encouraged them to either follow a personalised learning pathway (PLP) suggested to them by the system, or choose to devise their own individual (personal) learning plan (ILP). Data were collected using three instruments: course analytics, personalised questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The results demonstrate that learners used several forms of personalisation, with an ILP being the most prominent. Learners who opted to follow a PLP cited an appropriate level of content as their primary reason for doing so, while those who chose to devise their own ILP cited having control over their learning and individual preferences as their main reasons. We conclude that LMOOC learners were more likely to devise their own learning plan than to follow a recommended plan and that the optimal design for an LMOOC is to combine both types of personalisation.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.6
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agonács, N., & Matos, J. (2019). Understanding Language MOOC Learners: The Issue of Capability Development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i11.10205
Attwell, G. 2007. Personal learning environments—the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1–8. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.3011&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Barcena, E., & Martin-Monje, E. (2014). Language MOOCs: An Emerging Field. In E. Martin-Monje & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 1–10). De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.1
Bull, S., & Wasson B. (2016). Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 28(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000282
Cavanaugh, J. (2013). The Coming Personalization of Postsecondary Education Competencies. CAEL 2013 Forum & News: Competency-Based Education pp. 2–5. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/617695/premium_content_resources/CBE-Publications/PDF/CAEL_competency_based_education_2013.pdf
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. Retrieved from: http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge- 19May2012.pdf
Downes, S. (2013). Evaluating a MOOC. Retrieved from: http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/evaluating-mooc.html
Downes, S. (2016). Personal and Personalized Learning. EMMA Newsletter, Online, European Multiple MOOCs Aggregator. Retrieved from: https://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=65065
Godwin-Jones, R. (2009). Personal learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 3–9. https://www.lltjournal.org//item/2661
Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2863
Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Scaling up and zooming in: Big data and personalization in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 4–15. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2979
Heerwegh, D., Vanhove, T., Matthijs, K., & Loosveldt, G. (2005). The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in web surveys, International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000203107
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.004
Jitpaisarnwattana, N. & Reinders, H. (2021). Language MOOCs. In: L. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopaedia of English language teaching. (pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0999
Jitpaisarnwattana, N., Reinders, H., & Darasawang, P. (2019). Language MOOCS: An Expanding Field. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 1(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v1n1.142
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005
Moreira Teixeira, A., & Mota, J. (2014). A proposal for the methodological design of collaborative language MOOCs. In E. Martin-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 33–47). De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.3
Nikiforovs, P., & Bledaite, L. (2012), Personalized sequential language vocabulary learning recommender system. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o/d901 /b5dcf47db028f1e56b60b931b72d8767cb6a.pdf
Perifanou, M. (2015). Research report on the current state of language learning MOOCs worldwide: exploration, classification and evaluation. LangMOOC project. Retrieved from: http://www.langmooc.com/?cat=7
Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. (2014). MOOCS for foreign language learning: an effort to explore and evaluate the first practices. In Gómez Chova, L., López Martínez, A. & Candel Torres, I. (Eds). Proceedings of the INTED2014 conference (pp. 3561–3570).
Reinders, H. (2014). Personal learning environments for supporting out-of-class language learning. ELT Forum, 52(4), 14–19.
Salda?a, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Sallam, H., Martín-Monje, E., & Yan, L. (2020). Research trends in language MOOC studies: a systematic review of the published literature (2012–2018), Computer Assisted Language Learning. 33 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668
Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC? In E. Martin-Monje & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. (pp. 6–32). De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2
Sunar, A. S., Abdullah, N. A., White, S., & Davis, H. (2016) Personalisation in MOOCs: A critical literature review. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (Eds), Computer supported education, (pp. 152–168). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_9
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493