How Do Indonesian Student-Teachers Experience Wellbeing during Research Supervision? A Qualitative Interview Study

Elok Putri Nimasari, Slamet Setiawan, Ahmad Munir

Abstract


Research supervision is a collaborative and interactive process that plays a significant role in shaping the successful outcome of a student's learning in higher education. Crucial, but often neglected, we believe that the role of students’ wellbeing during dialogic and sociocultural interaction such as communication styles and expectations during thesis supervision raises issues concerning best practice in students' success. This qualitative interview study investigated thirteen student-teachers’ wellbeing at one private and one public English school in an additional language university context. Drawing on Seligman's positive psychology and Longo’s wellbeing thematic coding analysis, we reported how professional dialogue from dialogic and sociocultural perspectives in the supervisory interaction shape student-teachers’ five wellbeing dimensions: positive emotion, positive relationship, engagement, meaning and accomplishment. Micro elements of wellbeing were identified and analysed inductively. The findings illuminated how institutional and environmental cultures intricately shape students' wellbeing, highlighting that wellbeing is not only constructed through supervisory advice but also dynamically challenged and nurtured through ongoing dialogic interactions among students. The policy and practical implications arising from this research were discussed. 

 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.17


Keywords


dialogical interaction; sociocultural perspective; thesis supervision; wellbeing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ädel, A., Skogs, J., Lindgren, C., & Stridfeldt, M. (2023). The supervisor and student in Bachelor thesis supervision: A broad repertoire of sometimes conflicting roles. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2162560

Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., van der Schaaf, M. F., & van Tartwijk, J. (2021). Supervisor and student perspectives on Undergraduate thesis supervision in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1775115

Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140

Ando, S. (2021). University teaching and learning in a time of social distancing: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 31(1–4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1814928

Baik, C., Larcombe, W., & Brooker, A. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: The student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596

Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861

Brajša-Žganec, A., Kaliterna Lipov?an, L., & Hanzec, I. (2018). The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across the lifespan. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 27(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.27.1.03

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Gray, D. (Eds.). (2017). Collecting Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide to Textual, Media and Virtual Techniques (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295094

Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273216

Brownlow, C., Eacersall, D. C., Martin, N., & Parsons-Smith, R. (2023). The higher degree research student experience in Australian universities: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(7), 1608–1623. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2183939

Crossouard, B. (2009). A sociocultural reflection on formative assessment and collaborative challenges in the states of Jersey. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870801945909

Davis, D. (2020). The ideal supervisor from the candidate’s perspective: What qualities do students actually want? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1220–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669772

Derakhshan, A., Setiawan, S., & Ghafouri, M. (2024). Modeling the Interplay of Indonesian and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Apprehension, Resilience, Organizational Mattering, and Psychological Well-being. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2024.121416

Djatmika, D., Prihandoko, L. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2022). Lecturer supervisors’ perspectives on challenges in online thesis supervision: 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021), Padang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.048

Douwes, R., Metselaar, J., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., & Boonstra, N. (2023). Perceived educators’ roles in student well-being in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2272630. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2272630

El Khoury, S. J. (2019). Factors that impact the sociocultural adjustment and well-being of Syrian refugees in Stuttgart – Germany. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 47(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1520196

Gebremariam, E. T., & Gadisa, D. A. (2021). Factors affecting the quality of Undergraduate Pharmacy students’ researches in Ambo university, Ethiopia: A qualitative study from advisors’ perspective. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 12, 745–754. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S316201

Glazzard, J., & Stones, S. (2019). Student perceptions of feedback in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.3

Gunasekera, G., Liyanagamage, N., & Fernando, M. (2021). The role of emotional intelligence in student-supervisor relationships: Implications on the psychological safety of doctoral students. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100491

Hopwood, N. (2010). A sociocultural view of doctoral students’ relationships and agency. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482

Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730

Jackman, P. C., Slater, M. J., Carter, E. E., Sisson, K., & Bird, M. D. (2022). Social support, social identification, mental wellbeing, and psychological distress in doctoral students: A person-centred analysis. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2088272

Johnson, M., & Mercer, N. (2019). Using sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse professional discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.04.003

Lantolf, J. P., Xi, J., & Minakova, V. (2021). Sociocultural theory and concept-based language instruction. Language Teaching, 54(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000348

Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. http://library.lol/main/F9D255FB3524172EF8F0B05246524364

Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004

Liu, C., & Yu, S. (2022). Exploring master’s students’ emotions and emotion-regulation in supervisory feedback situations: A vignette-based study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1101–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2005770

Longo, Y., Coyne, I., & Joseph, S. (2018). Development of the short version of the scales of general well-being: The 14-item SGWB. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.042

Maulana, H., Obst, P., & Khawaja, N. (2018). Indonesian perspective of wellbeing: A qualitative study. The Qualitative Report, 23(12), 3136-3152 https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3508

Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2019). The routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677

Moss, R. A., Gorczynski, P., Sims-Schouten, W., Heard-Laureote, K., & Creaton, J. (2022). Mental health and wellbeing of postgraduate researchers: Exploring the relationship between mental health literacy, help-seeking behaviour, psychological distress, and wellbeing. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1168–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1906210

Nimasari, E. P., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., & Suhartono. (2023). Childhood, learning & everyday life in three Asia-Pacific cities: Experiences from Melbourne, Hong Kong and Singapore: edited by I-Fang Lee, Sue Saltmarsh and Nicola Yelland, Singapore, Springer, 2023, 161pp., €117.69 (Ebook), eISBN: 978-981-99-0486-0. Education 3-13, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2227631

Nimasari, E. P., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., & Suhartono, S. (2023). Why didn’t I make it digital: Indonesian teachers’ perception of dialogical-based online teaching and socio-emotional connections. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2258-2277. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6105

Pyhältö, K., Tikkanen, L., & Anttila, H. (2023). The more the merrier? PhD supervisors’ perspectives in engaging in co-supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2258853

Rahiem, M. D. H. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1

Razali, R., Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2020). How are undergraduate students supervised? Perceptions of students and supervisors in a Malaysian university. Issues in Educational Research, 3(4), 1484–1501. https://www.iier.org.au/iier30/razali.pdf

Ridner, S. L., Newton, K. S., Staten, R. R., Crawford, T. N., & Hall, L. A. (2016). Predictors of well-being among college students. Journal of American College Health, 64(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1085057

Roberts, L. D., & Seaman, K. (2018). Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: Perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412971

Rødnes, K. A., Rasmussen, I., Omland, M., & Cook, V. (2021). Who has power? An investigation of how one teacher led her class towards understanding an academic concept through talking and microblogging. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103229

Rönkkönen, S., Tikkanen, L., Virtanen, V., & Pyhältö, K. (2023). The impact of supervisor and research community support on PhD candidates’ research engagement. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2229565

Ryan, T., Baik, C., & Larcombe, W. (2022). How can universities better support the mental wellbeing of higher degree research students? A study of students’ suggestions. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1874886

Seligman, M. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press. http://library.lol/main/B48ED8AC6C904FE2C646033934D19720

Shield, W. (2023). The role of academic and professional tutors in supporting trainee educational psychologist wellbeing. Educational Psychology in Practice, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2148635

Smith, C. A., Barr, K., Alhassani, G., Taylor, E., & Conti, J. (2023). Experiences and challenges related to wellbeing faced by Australian higher degree research candidates prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2246411

Suparman, U. (2021). The implementation of the online thesis supervision during pandemic COVID-19 at one of Graduate and Postgraduate programs in Indonesia. AKSARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 22(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v22i1.pp43-53

Watson, D., Tregaskis, O., Gedikli, C., Vaughn, O., & Semkina, A. (2018). Well-being through learning: A systematic review of learning interventions in the workplace and their impact on well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1435529

Widodo, H. P. (2014). Methodological considerations in interview data transcription. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 8. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/methodological-considerations-interview-data/docview/1625463330/se-2

Wong, M.-Y. (2016). Teacher–student power relations as a reflection of multileveled intertwined interactions. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.916600

Xu, L., & Grant, B. (2017). International doctoral students’ becoming: A dialogic perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1318711

Zhang, Y. (Olivia), & Hyland, K. (2021). Advice-giving, power and roles in theses supervisions. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.002

Zhao, J., Chapman, E., & O’Donoghue, T. (2023). Threats to the emotional wellbeing of mainland Chinese students studying in Australia: An interpretivist study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 18(1), 2221912. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2221912


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493