Visualising the Doctoral Research Process: An Exploration into Empirical Research Processes of Emerging Researchers
Abstract
The completion of a doctoral programme requires a fundamental knowledge of the research process. It is assumed and expected by academic staff that PhD students are aware of the research process prior to undertaking doctoral research. This study addresses the degree to which these assumptions are valid, by investigating doctoral students’ understanding and practices of doctoral research. Nine doctoral students, at various phases of their dissertation and from different discipline backgrounds, were asked to illustrate, through diagrams, the processes involved in their doctoral research. They were invited to discuss their illustrated ideas and explain in more detail the processes and practices they employed, including the role of technology. The findings revealed a variety of processes characterised as: a) Linear vs. Non-linear; b) Traditional vs. Non-traditional; c) Simple vs. Complicated. In addition, the students exhibited diverse styles of presenting the research process through: 1) the way they started their research; 2) the language they used to describe the process; and 3) the linearity and complexity of their doctoral research. The paper concludes with a number of important insights with regard to the student’s perceptions and practices of undertaking doctoral research. Confusion in these areas is a matter that directly affects the outcome of the dissertation as well as the PhD student’s future research practices.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Åkerlind, G. (2008). A phenomenographic approach to developing academics’ understanding of the nature of teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 633-644. doi:10.1080/13562510802452350
Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 271-285.
Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2005). The doctor of philosophy degree: A policy statement. Washington, D.C.
Gardner, S. K. (2007). "T heard it through the grapevine": Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54, 123-140.
Gardner, S. K. (2008). "What's too much and what's too little?": The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0007
Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), New directions for higher education (pp. 55-64).
Golde, C. M. (2010). Entering different worlds. Socialization into disciplinary communities. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar. Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 79-95). Sterling, VA: Stylus: Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Green, A., S. , Rafaeli, E., Bolger, N., Shrout, P., E. , & Reis, H., T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 87-105. Retrieved from http://docsfiles.com/pdf_paper_or_plastic_data_equivalence_in_paper_and_electronic_diaries.html doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage.
Hoskins, C., & Goldberg, A. (2005). Doctoral student persistence in counselor education programs: Student–program match. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44(3), 175-188.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330-358.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245-262.
Leonard, D., Becker, R., & Coate, K. (2005). To prove myself at the highest level: The benefits of doctoral study. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 135-149.
Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225-244. doi:10.1080/00313830500109535
Nelson, A. (1994). Researching adult transformation as autobiography. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 13(5), 389-403
Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135-150
Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221-232.
Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research 46(2), 137-149.
Spencer, S. (2011). Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences (First ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33-50.
Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1-34.
Wellington, J. (2012). Searching for 'doctorateness'. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1490-1503.
Wood, K. (2006). Changing as a person: the experience of learning to research in the social sciences. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 53-66.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493