Teachers’ Views on the Interdependence of Humanity and Technology in Life Sciences Teaching and Learning within the Context of the 5IR

Zainul Moola, Sam Ramaila, Thasmai Dhurumraj

Abstract


The advent of the 5th Industrial Revolution (5IR) has brought a transformative shift to the educational landscape. The primary goal of 5IR is to address the inconsistencies observed in the preceding 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). With a heightened emphasis on digitalization, Artificial Intelligence, automation, and the Internet of Things, there is a renewed focus on the role of humans in an era of rapid technological innovation. The impact of 5IR on Life Sciences education is particularly intriguing, prompting an exploration of the interplay between technology and humanity from the perspective of Life Sciences teachers. This research employs a mixed-method approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methods. A questionnaire was used to assess the baseline knowledge related to 5IR, followed by interviews with two participants immersed in technology-rich environments, which are essential for a 5IR-aligned classroom. The findings suggest that a Life Sciences classroom integrating digitalization and humanistic approaches aligns with 5IR standards. In the context of 5IR pedagogy, the focus is on the teacher and learner, with technology serving as a complementary tool to enhance the learning experience. The study reveals varying degrees of understanding and application among participants regarding the coexistence of human and technological elements in their teaching practices. These findings highlight the challenges and opportunities teachers face as they navigate the evolving educational landscape. Grounded in connectivism as its theoretical framework, the research has implications for educational policymakers, curriculum developers, and teacher training programs, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to align teaching practices with the demands of the 5IR. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the interdependence of humanity and technology in Life Sciences education within the framework of the 5IR. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.24



Keywords


5IR; humanism; interdependence; life sciences; personalisation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3(6), 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093.

Downes, S. (2020). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0014.

Draghici, A., Mocan, A., & Paschek, D. (2019). Industry 5.0 – The expected impact on the next industrial revolution. In Technology, Innovation and Industrial Management (International Conference, 2019) (pp. 125-132).

Elayyan, S. (2021). The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.737193

Ema, A. (2020). Realizing Society 5.0 to face the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and teacher education curriculum readiness in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Engineering, 3, 543-548. https://doi.org/10.14421/icse.v3.559.

Fukayama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a human-centred society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47-50.

Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Foroughi, B., Babaee Tirkolaee, E., Asadi, S., & Amran, A. (2023). Industry 5.0 implications for inclusive sustainable manufacturing: An evidence-knowledge-based strategic roadmap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 138023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138023

Giri, R., Shrestha, S., & Dawadi, S. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20.

Naidoo, J., & Govender, R. (2021). Postgraduate mathematics education students' perceptions of technology-based tools and resources: Exploring the influences of connectivism and the three worlds of mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(6), 1214-1223. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090610.

Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation, and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010.

Janse Van Rensburg, N., Telukdarie, A., & Dhamija, P. (2019). Society 4.0 applied in Africa: Advancing the social impact of technology. Technology in Society, 59, 101125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.001.

Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, 11(3), 79-94.

Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010.

Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L., & Xu, X. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 – Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61(1), 530-535.

Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26, 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257.

Mele, V., & Belardinelli, P. (2018). Mixed methods in public administration research: Selecting, sequencing, and connecting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy046

Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., Mason-Jones, R., Matthews, R., & Ndrecaj, V. (2024). Higher education via the lens of Industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828

Noble, S. M., Mende, M., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (2022). The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How harmonious human–machine collaboration is triggering a retail and service [R]evolution. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.003

Nyagadza, B., Pashapa, R., Chare, A., Mazuruse, G., & Hove, P. K. (2022). Digital technologies, Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) & global value chains (GVCs) nexus with emerging economies’ future industrial innovation dynamics. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2014654. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2014654

Sudibjo, N., Idawati, L., & Harsanti, H. G. R. (2019). Characteristics of learning in the era of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:213865712.

Suzuki, K. (2021). Contribution of the Japan Society for Educational Technology toward a super-smart society (Society 5.0). Information and Technology in Education and Learning, 1(1), 1-7.

Voskoglou, M. G. (2022). Connectivism vs traditional theories of learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-10-4-15.

Yulianto, Y. (2021). The needs of training to improve teacher competence in preparing Society 5.0. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 20, 275-286.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493