Active Learning Pedagogy for Enriching Economics Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills
Abstract
This paper advances active learning as a pedagogic praxis in Economics education to enrich students’ critical and higher order thinking skills (i.e., analysis, evaluation, and synthesis). The paper is grounded within Critical Theory (CT) as a theoretical lens, which gives this intellectual piece an impetus to propagate empowerment and transformation as guiding principles. The paper adopted Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a methodological approach to generating data. The two overarching research questions that developed the intellectual elements of this paper are: what are the challenges faced by Economics students in responding to higher order questions? How can active learning pedagogy be used to enrich Economics students’ critical and higher order thinking skills? A thematic analysis technique was used to analyse the discourses generated. Research shows that students find it challenging to respond to higher order questions and that Economics teaching is predominantly skewed towards the conventional lecture approach or the teacher-centred method, which often does not create opportunities for students to be actively engaged in the teaching and learning process, thus leaving them as passive recipients of knowledge. Based on the findings, this paper argues for active learning as a more unconventional pedagogy in Economics teaching to empower students to respond to higher order questions.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.15
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ancho, I., & Serbo, R. S. (2019). Authentic Learning in teaching Economics. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/
37134/jrpptte.vol9.no1.1.2019
Asarta, C. J., Chambers, R. G., & Harter, C. (2021). Teaching methods in undergraduate introductory Economics courses: Results from a sixth national quinquennial survey. The American Economist, 66(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434520974658
Asok, D., Abirami, A. M., Angeline, N., & Lavanya, R. (2016, December). Active learning environment for achieving higher order thinking skills in engineering education. In 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) (pp. 47–53). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/mite.2016.020
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Analysing task design and students’ responses to context-based problems through different analytical frameworks. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/
2014.989495
Carlson, J. A., & Velenchik, A. (2006). Using the case method in the Economics classroom. In W. E. Becker, S. R. Becker & M. W. Watts (Eds.), (2006). Teaching Economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 59–74). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chumak, M., Nekrasov, S., Hrychanyk, N., Prylypko, V., & Mykhalchuk, V. (2022). Applying Case Method in the Training of Future Specialists. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 235–244.
Conway, P., Stimel, D., Davis, A. E., & Hartmann, M. (2010). Case use in Economics instruction. In C. Elliott (Ed.), Teaching Innovations in Economics (pp. 37–47). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781002452.00013
De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2005). Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions. Van Schaik Publishers.
Department of Basic Education. (2021). Economics mediation of diagnostic report and examination guidelines. Grade 12. Department of Education Printers.
Gogus, A. (2012). Active Learning. In: Seel,NM (ed) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. New York. pp 77–80.
Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox. Action research, 4(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Hoyt, G. M., & McGoldrick, K. (Eds.). (2012). International handbook on teaching and learning Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ismail, R., Awang, M., Pyng, S. Y., & Abdullah, M. R. B. (2020). Active Learning in economic subjects: A case study at secondary school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.10.2
Joshi, P., & Marri, A. R. (2006). An Economics methods course? Challenges of teaching an Economics education methods course for secondary social studies pre-service teachers. The Social Studies, 97(5), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.97.5.197-202
Kemmis, S. (2008). Critical theory and participatory action research. The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, 2(2008), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.
/9781848607934.n14
Kurniawati, T. (2021, November). Student’s Higher Order Thinking Skills in Economics in The VUCA Era. In Seventh Padang International Conference On Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2021) (pp. 253–256). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211117.065
Malanog, S., & Aliazas, J. V. (2021). Active Learning Strategies and Higher order Thinking Skills of Grade 10 students. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj255
Malek, N. P., Hall, J. C., & Hodges, C. (2014). A review and analysis of the effectiveness of alternative teaching methods on student learning in Economics. West Virginia Univ., Department of Economics. http://busecon.wvu.edu/phd_Economics/pdf/14–27.pdf
Martinez Casanovas, M., Ruiz-Munzon, N., & Buil-Fabrega, M. (2022). Higher education: The best practices for fostering competences for sustainable development through the use of active learning methodologies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(3), 703–727.
Nepal, R., & Rogerson, A. M. (2020). From theory to practice of promoting student engagement in business and law-related disciplines: The case of undergraduate Economics education. Education Sciences, 10(8), 205.
Nguyen, T., & Trimarchi, A. (2010). Active Learning in Introductory Economics: Do MyEconLab and Aplia Make Any Difference? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), n1. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040110
Ping, L. C. (2003). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Addressing the Challenges of Economics Education: To Be or Not To Be? International Review of Economics Education, 2(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1477-3880(15)30153-5
Popescu, D. (2014). Teaching Economics—The case method. Annals of the "Constantin Brâncu?i.s course for secondary social studies preservice teachers. The Social Studies, 97(5), 197–202. https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2014-06/53_DANIELA%
POPESCU.pdf
Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5.
Ray, M. (2018). Teaching Economics using ‘cases’– Going beyond the ‘chalk-and-talk’ method. International Review of Economics Education, 27, 1–9. https://doi.org/
1016/j.iree.2017.12.001
Romadhoni, I., & Nurlaela, L. (2018, July). Higher Order Thinking Skills to Enhance Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. In International Conference on Indonesian Technical Vocational Education and Association (APTEKINDO 2018) (pp. 91–94). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aptekindo-18.2018.20
Salemi, M. K. (2009). Clickenomics: Using a classroom response system to increase student engagement in a large-enrollment principles of Economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 40(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480903237950
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2010). New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty. Routledge.
Vasiliki, B., Panagiota, K., & Stavrakouli, K. M. (2016). A new teaching method for teaching Economics in secondary education. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(2), 86–93. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-6%20Issue-2/Version-1/O0602018693.pdf
Volpe, G. (2015). Case teaching in Economics: History, practice and evidence. Cogent Economics & Finance, 3(1), 1120977. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977
Wentland, D. (2004). A Guide for Determining Which Teaching Methodology to Utilize in Economic Education: Trying to Improve How Economic Information Is Commu- nicated to Students. Education, 124(4).
Whiting, C. (2006). Data-based active learning in the principles of macroEconomics course: A mock FOMC meeting. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(2), 171–177.
Yen, T. S., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41–47.
Zain, Z. M., Subramaniam, G., Abd Rashid, A., & Ghani, E. K. (2009). Teaching Economics Using Cooperative Learning Approach: Accounting Students’ performance and Attitude. Canadian Social Science, 5(6), 92–102.
Zoller, U., & Nahum, T. L. (2012). From teaching to KNOW learning to THINK in science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 209–229). Springer, Dordrecht.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493